Minolta.
I'm just playing, but really, this is a pointless question. Both companies are so interlocked in commercial combat that they have basically become one in the same. It's just a matter of which name you feel like saying more. Canon can be cheaper on bodies, sometimes lenses, but there is rarely a real difference between the two. Looking into Sony, Fuji, Sigma, Olympus, etc, that is when you start seeing the playing field expanding in terms of functional differences.
Don't get locked into a process where you think one of these two companies holds the key to great photos, they just happen to be the biggest. I love what Sigma has done with the Foveon processor on their DSLRs, and Fuji is starting to make headway into the mess of giant imaging companies. Look for yourself and decide, thats the only real answer for this question.