Not very happy with these CC

[MWG]

Ok, as some of you know already. I shoot people. Cityscapes are something i struggle with. Composition is what i struggle with mostly when i go the cityscape route. If anyone would break the thingss down hard and let me know what i did wrong, it would be very appreciated.

1

2

3

4

 

[MWG]

Damn i knew they were bad, but not one post? lol

 

[piggle5]

I'm in the same boat as you not being able to photograph cityscapes so I don't have a lot to say. BUT, I think that in the first one the head kind of blends in. I think it would look cooler if it really stood out, not sure how you would do that because I think the perspective is good, just not popping to me....

 

[Kbarredo]

I like the first and fourth. The angle of the building of the third one is more attractive to me than the head on. I really like the first one. The ladder one is a little bland to me and the building head on makes it seem flat.

 

[MWG]

When i was photographing this building, i was kicking myself in the but for selling my wide angle.

 

[MWG]

I like the first and third. The angle of the building of the third one is more attractive to me than the head on. I really like the first one. The ladder one is a little bland to me and the building head on makes it seem flat.

yea its an odd building, would have needed a wide angle lens to capture the whole thing, its actually a cool painting

 

[MWG]

trippin

 

[RauschPhotography]

There's no need to bump your post this soon after the original post---this early in the morning, especially. The first picture would have been a little better if shot wide, using the rule of thirds. The rest of the shots don't do much for me, but I wouldn't call them terrible. Working on your composition could be a great asset to improving your photography. :thumbup:

 

[reserveshoot]

There's no need to bump your post this soon after the original post---this early in the morning, especially. The first picture would have been a little better if shot wide, using the rule of thirds. The rest of the shots don't do much for me, but I wouldn't call them terrible. Working on your composition could be a great asset to improving your photography. :thumbup:

5-0

 

[MWG]

There's no need to bump your post this soon after the original post---this early in the morning, especially. The first picture would have been a little better if shot wide, using the rule of thirds. The rest of the shots don't do much for me, but I wouldn't call them terrible. Working on your composition could be a great asset to improving your photography. :thumbup:

Sorry, i let late night insomnia get to me. lol Do you find this crop to be better?

 

[FireRunner]

Have to understand that you posted in the middle of the night on a Saturday/Sunday morning for NA folks. People are not going to be around. Also, never bump a post that's already the top 1-10 threads on the list. Whoever visits will see your thread.

 

[MWG]

You have to understand, im new, unemployed atm, and having problems sleeping. LOL

 

[mwcfarms]

The fourth one for me is the most interesting. I think all need a bit of boost of color/contrast and sharpening. I have not much experience with city scapes since I live on the farm and the closest town has 200 people. Lol.

 

[MWG]

The fourth one for me is the most interesting. I think all need a bit of boost of color/contrast and sharpening. I have not much experience with city scapes since I live on the farm and the closest town has 200 people. Lol.

Notice all the triangles formed...type of stuff you notice after you been on the intranet for to long

 

[NCAFLeo88]

Sorry, i let late night insomnia get to me. lol Do you find this crop to be better?

Much better IMO. The sky gives it something a little extra. I like it.