Nuthin' to see here...

[manaheim]

Just move it along...

 

[Frequency]

Very beautiful......!!!!

 

[manaheim]

Thanks. But... um... did you see it?

 

[kundalini]

ribbet

 

[paigew]

haha took me a minute

 

[manaheim]

Me too. I should have done one from the other side of the bridge... you really couldn't see them at ALL, but the light was less ideal there.

 

[jowensphoto]

clever!

 

[Frequency]

:meh: O, i really missed that and referring to the beauty of the those leaves only; now i see

 

[manaheim]

hehe... My daughters were like "Daddy, a frog!!" I was like "uhhh... where?"

 

[fjrabon]

YOU COULD TOTALLY MAKE IT STAND OUT MORE WITH THE COLOR PLASH EFFECT I HAVE ON MY IPHONE!!!111!1!!!! IT MAKES MOST OF THE PICTURE BLACK AND WHITE, BUT THE FROG COULD BE GREEN!!!!!

 

[kundalini]

YOU COULD TOTALLY MAKE IT STAND OUT MORE WITH THE COLOR PLASH EFFECT I HAVE ON MY IPHONE!!!111!1!!!! IT MAKES MOST OF THE PICTURE BLACK AND WHITE, BUT THE FROG COULD BE GREEN!!!!!

So that would be something like selective coloring?




That would suck big fat hairy ones!

 

[invisible]

YOU COULD TOTALLY MAKE IT STAND OUT MORE WITH THE COLOR PLASH EFFECT I HAVE ON MY IPHONE!!!111!1!!!! IT MAKES MOST OF THE PICTURE BLACK AND WHITE, BUT THE FROG COULD BE GREEN!!!!!

So that would be something like selective coloring?




That would suck big fat hairy ones!

So I take it you don't like the idea much?

 

[kundalini]

So I take it you don't like the idea much?

The technique has its time and place, but in general.... no specifically, it's not my cup of tea.

 

[invisible]

So I take it you don't like the idea much?

The technique has its time and place, but in general.... no specifically, it's not my cup of tea.

Your previous post basically summarized my thoughts on the technique... I wish my English vocabulary were so deep

 

[fjrabon]

Pro tip: somebody including 1's along with their '!'s generally indicates sarcasm.