What look were you going for? His eyes kind of scare me. I think it's because they're overcooked. But with the red, scary works well if that was your intention.
Yes, even full size it could still be a little bigger.
Your use of color is jarring. Usually, when we see pink or shades of red we think of the female, not the male. Also, high key is probably not the best light for men, either. Furthermore, this shot should be oriented vertically, since there is no particular reason to hold the camera in landscape position. Now that I look more, I think the pose is wrong too.
The best way to fix this shot is to substitute a woman in the picture, and take a different shot entirely of this man. Better pose, low key, portrait format, and definitely a different color.
Yes, even full size it could still be a little bigger.
Your use of color is jarring. Usually, when we see pink or shades of red we think of the female, not the male. Also, high key is probably not the best light for men, either. Furthermore, this shot should be oriented vertically, since there is no particular reason to hold the camera in landscape position. Now that I look more, I think the pose is wrong too.
The best way to fix this shot is to substitute a woman in the picture, and take a different shot entirely of this man. Better pose, low key, portrait format, and definitely a different color.
View attachment 17117 Color balance and levels adjustment. It doesn't scare me this way!
The contrast seems a bit over the top...the bridge of his nose and his T-shirts are the absolutely BRIGHTEST things in the entire shot, and that's "stealing from him" as the old saying goes. His gaze is direct, confrontational, frank, open, jarring--whatever...yeah, we get that. BUT that black hole under his hat brim, and then the nearly blown-out whites make the image look kind of cheezy, kind of "artificially juiced". There is too high a degree of contrast...the black, detail-less forehead looks bad. I'm sure if I opened that up in PS< that the variations command would show the shadows are too dark, and the saturation is also too high. I think dialing the sliders back from MAX in three separate areas would make this shot sing!
Your degree of contrast is so high that, especially in the second version, it looks like he is wearing eyeliner...there is a SOLID BLACK line around each eye...this kind of thing can happen when a guy sits at the computer and works on an image too long...the image starts to look "okay" even if it's adjusted pretty over-the-top.
I think with that 35mm prime you should have stepped back to avoid much of the distortion in this photo, unless that was your intention. Oh, and I'd lose the vignette. I just don't like artificial vignettes - 95% of the time they only detract.
The expression is somewhat unsettling, but I rather like that aspect of this image. Nice.
That was his expression all day..never smiled said he didn't want to/wasn't him and every time he did smile/laugh he would turn his head!!!
I think with that 35mm prime you should have stepped back to avoid much of the distortion in this photo, unless that was your intention. Oh, and I'd lose the vignette. I just don't like artificial vignettes - 95% of the time they only detract.
The expression is somewhat unsettling, but I rather like that aspect of this image. Nice.
. That was his expression all day..never smiled said he didn't want to/wasn't him and every time he did smile/laugh he would turn his head!!! I tried to catch him talking with him etc he was hard. Thanks for the feedback. I am thinking I should scrap the PS action in the morning and go at it again when I don't have tired eyes...lol