Jedo_03
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2008
- Messages
- 328
- Reaction score
- 0
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jedo_03
ART is one thing... SEXUALITY and PERVERSION is something else...
The fact that you equate the two says a lot about you, and the society we live in. Why is nudity so terrible?
Aha - Am I to presume that 'what' it says about me is negative..?
Just because I don't happen to agree with YOUR views on mankind, the Earth and the Universe empowers you to make and pass judgements on me - does it??
And I didn't say that nudity is terrible...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jedo_03
Well - That is true - men can provide a wider range of angles than women... 192 deg (7 oclock) flaccid - to 270 deg (11 oclock) turgid...
But is it the "angle of the dangle" that provides the visual compulsion - or the inherent sexuality of the aroused male...?
Put another way - Would "David" be more attractive at 270 deg than he is now...?
When I wrote about "angles" I knew someone was going to make an erection joke. I just didn't know how long it would take, and how lame it would be. Obviously those two unknowns have been answered.
Short answer: so the word "angles" conjures up subliminal thoughts of erections in your mind too - eh?
Long answer: I've been around (both life and the internet) for far too long to be even the slightest bothered by the kind of childish derision you offer here, more so because your remarks are made behind the anonymity of the internet.
Perhaps we should all maintain a photographic focus on a photographic forum rather than promulgating our personal beliefs, philosophies and mores - and not resort to negative comment when some other thinking person has an alternative view.
Crimen non est circum bananam condomum flectere
Jedo
Originally Posted by Jedo_03

ART is one thing... SEXUALITY and PERVERSION is something else...
The fact that you equate the two says a lot about you, and the society we live in. Why is nudity so terrible?
Aha - Am I to presume that 'what' it says about me is negative..?
Just because I don't happen to agree with YOUR views on mankind, the Earth and the Universe empowers you to make and pass judgements on me - does it??
And I didn't say that nudity is terrible...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jedo_03

Well - That is true - men can provide a wider range of angles than women... 192 deg (7 oclock) flaccid - to 270 deg (11 oclock) turgid...
But is it the "angle of the dangle" that provides the visual compulsion - or the inherent sexuality of the aroused male...?
Put another way - Would "David" be more attractive at 270 deg than he is now...?
When I wrote about "angles" I knew someone was going to make an erection joke. I just didn't know how long it would take, and how lame it would be. Obviously those two unknowns have been answered.
Short answer: so the word "angles" conjures up subliminal thoughts of erections in your mind too - eh?
Long answer: I've been around (both life and the internet) for far too long to be even the slightest bothered by the kind of childish derision you offer here, more so because your remarks are made behind the anonymity of the internet.
Perhaps we should all maintain a photographic focus on a photographic forum rather than promulgating our personal beliefs, philosophies and mores - and not resort to negative comment when some other thinking person has an alternative view.
Crimen non est circum bananam condomum flectere
Jedo