FattyMcJ
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2010
- Messages
- 780
- Reaction score
- 29
- Location
- Colorado
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
You won't know the difference till you spent some time behind a camera with a real prism viewfinder...
While this is true, the opposite is also true...if you don't know any better, does that make it bad? Sub-optimal, sure, but a no-brainer choice? No.
Just because it works for you doesn't make it the ideal. Part of the extra cost of higher end bodies is the brighter viewfinder... that's across the brands.
Indeed, I'll agree with that.
Simply put, to bias towards pentax because of their past history is just misleading. I am a pentax fan..... but their modern dslrs isn't up to par of what I would expect from them.
How is it misleading? Isn't that what MOST consumers do? Past experiences, reviews, etc. I don't understand what point you're trying to make.
If really want to compare sheer size, your kx is huge compared to my olympus and panasonic... and not much smaller than my leica.
Size yes, bigger than Olympus & Panasonic....but much better too.
If you want to compare ISO 3200 and high performance, Nikon and Canon has Pentax beat (and almost any other brand).
Apples to apples, no they don't. The T1i (same generation as the K-x) is sub-par according to most reviews done by 3rd party websites. The D5000 has the same sensor (as does the D90)...so that doesn't "beat Pentax" either. The T2i is actually inferior to the K-x and D5000. There IS a point at which more MP doesn't = better quality.
I always try to post honestly even being critical of cameras that I own myself. Don't take this the wrong way... enjoy your KX.
And for that, you are respected. Thank you, I will enjoy it! :mrgreen: