imagemaker46
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2011
- Messages
- 4,422
- Reaction score
- 1,705
- Location
- Ottawa, Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
The musician analogy is an excellent one; may I use that? To respond, I would ask, "How many of those garage musicians (and I mean no disrespect whatsoever with that term) get a weekend gig at a pub having only had their guitar/sax/bass/harpsichord for only a few months? I'm willing to bet not many. Most of them have probably been practicing since they were in school and have many hours work to their credit before they get their first paid job.I admire you professional photographers who do this for a living, especially those who are full time photographers! But, I have to say that in my short time here the word "business" is a word of contempt in many cases. I relate it to an amateur musician making some money playing open mic nights, or a bar band playing their hearts out for $300 every weekend. Nobody said these are the greatest musicians in the world, but would you want your cover charge back because the band sucked? Sometimes you probably hear a pretty darn good band and think it was a steal to hear such a talented band for a $5 cover charge! My photography is an open mic night, a bar band if you will. I'm new, inexpensive, and convenient.
Not the case at all. We're trying to help! It sounds harsh, even hurtful, but the reality is, many people don't know how much they don't know. To refer to your musician's analogy, would you say to me, if I had purchased my guitar six months ago (never having played a note in my life before that) and could now just manage to play "Stairway to Heaven" (more or less) I should seek paying gigs? I'm betting not!The part that really saddens me is that people like the OP and I are not taken seriously here. We are newbies, and our product isn't worth a lick in some of your books. But, as a guitar player I've learned to have thick skin. EVERY guitar player I run across can outplay Jimi Hendrix...just how it goes.
And the problem there will be raising your rates. People who paid you $50 last year for their Christmas card shot are not going to be pleased when you say the same shot this will cost them $200! Like Imagemaker, I have NO issue with anyone trying to make a go of paid photography, but I do feel that it's important to get across to them how to do it correctly.I can't speak for the OP, but I for example certainly say that! I inform the client that I am trying to make a name for myself and grow my client base through word of mouth, and I offer them a very reasonable rate. You want to know something crazy? I have had TERRIBLE luck getting people to let me take their photos for free. It's like I am wasting their time if I offer them a free session. I've had much better luck with a discounted rate than I ever had offering free photos. Once my portfolio grows and I get some decent experience, I plan to create a reasonable but realistic rate. I'm not the best photographer in the world by a LONG shot, but I will give my clients more than they pay for in most cases.
Ah see, you've caught me at my own analogy lol! The proof is in the product. If a band has a bunch of new musicians that don't know how to play a lick and they get a bar gig, chances are they won't be playing many more gigs if you get my drift. To me, if a photographer isn't very good, then it will show in how quickly they get repeat and referral business.
You guys have been awesome. I actually don't take offense to much and it's hard to hurt my feelings. I just see a lot of people around here taking offense when newbies mention business and I'm just calling it like I see it. People think they are better than what they are, and it's difficult to hear the truth. I've sat through countless critiques as a graphics major so I'm almost numb to it. When critiques are based on preference though, I tend to ignore fully.
And imagemaker46, you make some killer points about photography today. We actually had many discussions on that topic in college. As I said above, the cream will rise to the top...or however the saying goes. Think of it like this...the amateur photographers are servicing a part of the market that the professionals will never reach. Plenty of people will pay $200 for a session and that's great, but for every person out there that will pay $200, there are 20 that wouldn't or couldn't spend more than $75. That's the target market for the newbies IMO.
What has changed is that there are is a lot of the market that professionals used to be required for, I used to make good money just doing simple head shots for media guides, company reports, etc, that side has vanished for me when digital rolled in Now they use someone in the office with a camera that could just take pictures, the quality may not be the same but that doesn't matter anymore. So those $75 shoots that I would have done 10 times a week is gone.