- Joined
- Jul 8, 2005
- Messages
- 45,747
- Reaction score
- 14,806
- Location
- Victoria, BC
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
- Moderator 🛠️
- #1
For the last couple of years I've made a concerted effort to keep my GAS* under control and haven't bought anything that I couldn't justify from a business perspective. In addition, while I really enjoy portraiture, I'm not sure that I would call it "fun". After reading reviews and seeing some of the results posted here from Nikon's new-ish 200-500, I relaiized I'd missed having some long reach for personal shooting. The lens was advertised at one of my local stores, and I decided to take a chance.
I have to say, I'm very pleased, and overall, for the price, I think this lens is a real gem. The VR is excellent, and I had no problem hand-holding 1/125 at 500mm. At 500mm it's a little unweildly, but it's not terribly heavy, and hand-held shooting is not difficult.
It's more than acceptably sharp across the range, and even the corners at 500mm and f5.6 are acceptable. It's no 400mm f2.8 prime, but it's also no $7500 either! There are a couple of negatives: The bokeh is not exatly pleasing, and while overall the build quality is very good for a lens of this range, the tripod foot, specifically the threads for the tripod mount are a concern. Instead of being threaded metal, the foot is polycarbonate with a helicoil style insert pressed into it. I see this as a real weak point, and would be VERY careful about how much torque is applied when attaching a QR plate and definitely do NOT recommend using a BlackRapid style strap.
That said, the proof is in the pudding, so here are a couple of examples (all with a D800):
1.
ISO 400, 500mm, f9; subject about 150 yards away
2.
ISO 400, 500mm, f25, subject about 100 yards away
3.
Rather "nervous" bokeh, but decent detail & sharpness
4.
ISO 640, 500mm, f16 - This is the full frame of #3 posted for reference.
*Gear Acquisition Syndrome
I have to say, I'm very pleased, and overall, for the price, I think this lens is a real gem. The VR is excellent, and I had no problem hand-holding 1/125 at 500mm. At 500mm it's a little unweildly, but it's not terribly heavy, and hand-held shooting is not difficult.
It's more than acceptably sharp across the range, and even the corners at 500mm and f5.6 are acceptable. It's no 400mm f2.8 prime, but it's also no $7500 either! There are a couple of negatives: The bokeh is not exatly pleasing, and while overall the build quality is very good for a lens of this range, the tripod foot, specifically the threads for the tripod mount are a concern. Instead of being threaded metal, the foot is polycarbonate with a helicoil style insert pressed into it. I see this as a real weak point, and would be VERY careful about how much torque is applied when attaching a QR plate and definitely do NOT recommend using a BlackRapid style strap.
That said, the proof is in the pudding, so here are a couple of examples (all with a D800):
1.
ISO 400, 500mm, f9; subject about 150 yards away
2.
ISO 400, 500mm, f25, subject about 100 yards away
3.
Rather "nervous" bokeh, but decent detail & sharpness
4.
ISO 640, 500mm, f16 - This is the full frame of #3 posted for reference.
*Gear Acquisition Syndrome