That second scull today in b&w gallery. You have to take more care with light and exposure (regarding #1, #2 is a bit better) and, when presenting such a subject, which for all practical purposes is a portrait, also watch the background. Yours has sharp horizontal division running on the scull level.
I see you keep good records. The "great" secret of photography is to have always abundance of light. This is better than high ISO, especially with digital cameras, where sensor performs best at native ISO setting, without any amplifications.
Good luck to you and keep shooting.
The "great" secret of photography is to have always abundance of light...
The "great" secret of photography is to have always abundance of light...
This is one point where I would have to agree to disagree. Some of the best people photos I've ever taken where in places where I had to push 400 ASA film to 800 or 1600, yes the images had more than a little grain, but that's exactly what sets them apart from picture perfect, perfectly exposed images, is that gritty, noisy, dark and dirty feel they have, I love it!
The "great" secret of photography is to have always abundance of light...
This is one point where I would have to agree to disagree. Some of the best people photos I've ever taken where in places where I had to push 400 ASA film to 800 or 1600, yes the images had more than a little grain, but that's exactly what sets them apart from picture perfect, perfectly exposed images, is that gritty, noisy, dark and dirty feel they have, I love it!It is always better to have plenty of light. Shooting in half dark and then push is counting on luck. In full light you can always expose for zone 7 and then extend development by +2 or you can use high contrast-low sodium sulfit developer for that gritty look you seek. And you will have it every time you want without taking chances.
Why strangle the light with such tight apertures, and then turn around and crank the ISO? Being that it's a still scene, what's the point of the long exposure?