Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I like the poses for the most part but the color is off. If it's deliberate, well, stop.
I like the poses for the most part but the color is off. If it's deliberate, well, stop.
I actually like the colour. I mean, it's not completely OUT there so much that it looks ugly. It just enhances the pictures to give them to feel to suit to the photographer's style of photography.
this :thumbdown:I like the poses for the most part but the color is off. If it's deliberate, well, stop.
#2 What the HECK happened to that girl's leg! clone it out ASAP!
I really think this is the kind of look you were going for but let me know if I'm wrong.
Shop the Catalog - June 2010 *-*Clothes *-*Anthropologie.com
I like the poses for the most part but the color is off. If it's deliberate, well, stop.
I actually like the colour. I mean, it's not completely OUT there so much that it looks ugly. It just enhances the pictures to give them to feel to suit to the photographer's style of photography.
Petraio Prime said:Why does everyone think that some form of 'manipulation' makes a photograph better? It usually doesn't. Americans, especially, seem obsessed with the latest gimmicky approach or fad. We have been through the Tri-X in Rodinal fad (printed on Agfa Brovira #4, a sub-fad), the posterization on litho film fad, the zoom during exposure fad, the zone system fad, the sandwiched slides fad, the cross-processing fad, the Velvia fad, the grainy pushed B&W fad, the HDR fad, and now this...
Using some kind of manipulation is no substitute for plain hard work and sensitivity to the subject.