PixelRabbit
A naughty little bunny...
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 6,593
- Reaction score
- 3,719
- Location
- Ontario
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
- Thread Starter 🔹
- #16
Wow, I'm not sure about the specific requirements around here but I do know that some kept the bulk of their land, some sold it all and some sold the land but moved their houses (one got stuck on a bridge down the road from us lol)In our quaint little neck of the woods, if the power company or other utility does an eminent domian heist of one's land, they must remove the property in its entirety, and if possible, either replace with an equal number of trees originally calculated to be a part of the original structure (x # board feet), on that spot or another designated by the state. If it is a non-wooden structure, while it still must be removed, no tree of other foliage replacement is required. It kind of kills shooting the old barns gig, but makes for a far more pleasant view whilst hiking through the woods.
Ah yes!! I do like it in black and white! Thanks for the edit!
I think it achieves minimizing the impact of the red barn and it maintains the two wind turbines bookending the barn and gives a reference for the turbine in the center that appears to be chewing away at the barn. I think that may be what is missing for me in Lew's crop, we have lost those turbines and in turn the one in the center becomes almost unidentifiable.

