::raises hand:: I have a question!!!

[e.rose]

NFSW little lady, don't want to go to work and BLAMO! boobies on the screen, got to have some standards lol.

Again... once upon a time when I was active on this forum, boudoir was allowed... we MARKED it as "NSFW" in the title... but it was allowed... so... what's up with this crap?

Probably some had a sh$% fit about some butt cheeks, complained and they closed down that forum. I never knew about until they reopened it recently when someone wanted to post some fake death photos.

And WHICH forum is that exactly?

Everyone I knew just posted their boudoir to "People Photography".

Which forum are you talking about?

And... I mean I know some people are squeamish, and I say this not knowing the whole backstory... but what's the issue with "fake death photos"?

Jesus, I'm not gonna be able to post ANYTHING here then. I'm starting to shoot boudoir and I have an idea for a "death" series I'm thinking about starting.

I might as well just... slink back to the Facebook Landfill I crawled back out from. :lmao:

Or maybe I've just grown up too much for this forum and I need to stick to the big girl forums. :er:

 

[IByte]

But, but I like the sass, it's giving this forum some new life into it Oo. What I meant to say was Nude forum/thread, but I do not know the whole story only it's been blocked to the non-supporters...last beer

 

[Overread17 5]

EROSE calm



Ok so few things 1 don't ask me about the forum image hosting - cause - I don't know that well

As for the subject of discussions, we've always had the policy that discussion in the subscribers section can be more political/risky than in the open site. The view being that those who pay to get in there will conduct themselves in a better manner so as not to get removed from there. It is still moderated and if the line is crossed it will be dealt with; but we do allow more hot button discussion there (its stone cold dead at present though ).

As for the subject of photos. The site itself is remaining safe for work; we recently re-allowed nudity and other subjects, but only in the subscribers gallery section. Boudoir should still be allowed as far as I'm aware -- however I'd respect members to realise that sometimes this area can get a little hazy with regard to what is classified as boudoir. If you are ever in and doubt pm a mod/admin or raise the issue in the feedback section.

Also - far as I'm aware - we are now not moving threads but lock/hiding them if the member who started the thread is not a subscriber and posts content suitable for the subscribers section (this also comes with an offer for them to become a subscriber if they choose to).

 

[e.rose]

Okay, then I wanna know what was wrong with the boudoir post that 412 Burgh posted?

Again... I'm not talking about NUDES... Nudes have never been allowed since I joined (although I know they used to be at some point).

I'm talking about a girl in a corset top, underwear, and stockings in a bedroom setting.

Probably MORE covered than a girl wearing a bikini... and THAT gets moved to the member's only section?

I'm just trying to understand what is allowed and isn't, since I haven't been around for any changes that may have (and apparently have) been made.

 

[Overread17 5]

I'm asking
I didn't deal with that specific situation so I'm not sure who called and moved it.

 

[e.rose]

I'm asking
I didn't deal with that specific situation so I'm not sure who called and moved it.

Thanks.

I iz just confuzzled.

 

[pixmedic]

there isnt really much clarification noted in the NSFW section concerning exactly what constitutes "NSFW" except that NSFW has to be in the title. I would venture to say that if there is any question as to whether a pic should be in that section or not, you could probably message a moderator and ask. just to be safe. let one of the Mods's make the decision and it takes the liability off of you.

 

[e.rose]

there isnt really much clarification noted in the NSFW section concerning exactly what constitutes "NSFW" except that NSFW has to be in the title. I would venture to say that if there is any question as to whether a pic should be in that section or not, you could probably message a moderator and ask. just to be safe. let one of the Mods's make the decision and it takes the liability off of you.

What liability?

If I'm questioning whether or not something is NSFW... I'm just gonna mark it as NSFW to be on the safe side...

What I'm trying to figure out is what KIND of NSFW content is ALLOWED... since Over is saying boudoir is okay... yet a boudoir post got moved... or deleted... or whatever the hell happened with it.

 

[412 Burgh]

What liability?

If I'm questioning whether or not something is NSFW... I'm just gonna mark it as NSFW to be on the safe side...

What I'm trying to figure out is what KIND of NSFW content is ALLOWED... since Over is saying boudoir is okay... yet a boudoir post got moved... or deleted... or whatever the hell happened with it.

KmH moved it to the supporting member forum so it's outta my hands. Can't even see it. Woohoo! 👍👍

 

[e.rose]

KmH is a mod now?

What ELSE has changed around here?

 

[pixmedic]

there isnt really much clarification noted in the NSFW section concerning exactly what constitutes "NSFW" except that NSFW has to be in the title. I would venture to say that if there is any question as to whether a pic should be in that section or not, you could probably message a moderator and ask. just to be safe. let one of the Mods's make the decision and it takes the liability off of you.

What liability?

If I'm questioning whether or not something is NSFW... I'm just gonna mark it as NSFW to be on the safe side...

What I'm trying to figure out is what KIND of NSFW content is ALLOWED... since Over is saying boudoir is okay... yet a boudoir post got moved... or deleted... or whatever the hell happened with it.

that was my point. in the NSFW section it doesn't TELL you what kind of photos are supposed to be in there.. just to mark the NSFW in the title. it doesnt give any criteria, or examples, or anything. I would just assume that anything I wouldnt want my kid to see should go in there.

 

[fjrabon]

some mods seem more or less zealous about certain things.

 

[pixmedic]

Maybe we should have a section for boudoir photos that don't show enough skin to really be NSFW.

 

[IByte]

Maybe we should have a section for boudoir photos that don't show enough skin to really be NSFW.

LOL I can see it now, smiley faces on the woman's chest with a PG-13 rating.

 

[e.rose]

that was my point. in the NSFW section it doesn't TELL you what kind of photos are supposed to be in there.. just to mark the NSFW in the title. it doesnt give any criteria, or examples, or anything. I would just assume that anything I wouldnt want my kid to see should go in there.

*What* NSFW "section"?????

Like I said before, boudoir was just always put into the People Photography section last time I was here...

some mods seem more or less zealous about certain things.

...which is why there needs to be a clear cut rule... although in saying that I can already see how that would just probably cause even MORE issues....

Maybe we should have a section for boudoir photos that don't show enough skin to really be NSFW.

As far as I'm concerned, all boudoir is NSFW... but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't be able to post it if we just warn people..... like we USED to. :roll: