Rate the photo above you

[lyonsroar]

I`m still a noob, but I think the road would be better in middle. I`d give a 6/10

Hold on, lemme go stand in the middle of HWY 59 so I can get the picture. I'm sure the truckers will understand...

One of the harder things to photograph. Difficult to get the wings looking like that. I think it needs to be cropped closer though.

7.9/10.

Another view of the Missouri River


Missouri River Flood 2011 by Lyonsroar91, on Flickr

 

[TCD photography]

Tad under exposed, but still a good shot. 8/10. Not sure how close you are zoomed in, but did you get a closer picture of the flood, perhaps with a reflection?

 

[kundalini]

This is a nearly a nice 2/3 mask, although pushing it a bit since the far eye is close to breaking the plane. Neither eye is in a power point causing not enough room of the right edge of the frame for him to breathe. Hot spots on the nose and specular highlights on the silver pieces. Main light set too low (9 o'clock). From the portraits of late, I'm giving this a 7/10.

 

[ulrichsd]

EDIT: It took me too long too post so here's my feedback on 2 photos ago. 7/10 Nice exposure, a bit warm as the skin tone quite red on my monitor looking sunburned. But I think you captured nice emotion in the eyes. Maybe cropped just a bit too tight for my tastes.

For the image above: 8/10 Its a good shot. Love the boy's expression, but it gets a little lost down in the bottom left corner, I'd prefer to have seen both subjects more to the left of the frame. Great color and contrast.

185mm f/5 @ 1/100 ISO 200 w/CPL


I know that the rating on some are subjective to reviewer and the style they enjoy. I've found that I've really liked a few that didn't get the best score, so I was thinking I'd go back and add my "like" to a few of the ones I've enjoyed (select like regarding the image posted, not the feedback). Just a thought.

 

[lyonsroar]

Ok, I'll play (page 8). 7/10 Nice exposure, a bit warm as the skin tone quite red on my monitor looking sunburned. But I think you captured nice emotion in the eyes. Maybe cropped just a bit too tight for my tastes.



I know that the rating on some are subjective to reviewer and the style they enjoy. I've found that I've really liked a few that didn't get the best score, so I was thinking I'd go back and add my "like" to a few of the ones I've enjoyed (select like regarding the image posted, not the feedback). Just a thought.

I suspect there are many people in here that are merely plucking a score from midair and posting it so that they can post their own picture.


The iconic duck shot. Nothing really to make it stand out among the droves of similar shots. Not as sharp as I would like either. Almost look like a greenish color cast, probably due to the water.
5/10



IMG_6133 by Lyonsroar91, on Flickr

 

[Ron Evers]

Not in focus, no room to swim into. 4/10

 

[ulrichsd]

I suspect there are many people in here that are merely plucking a score from midair and posting it so that they can post their own picture.

Scores are subjective from one person to another. I posted my honest feedback and hope it was helpful to the above posters. Isn't everyone posting a score so they can post their own picture, I thought that was the point of this thread?

Nice image, btw.

 

[lyonsroar]

I suspect there are many people in here that are merely plucking a score from midair and posting it so that they can post their own picture.

Scores are subjective from one person to another. I posted my honest feedback and hope it was helpful to the above posters. Isn't everyone posting a score so they can post their own picture, I thought that was the point of this thread?

Nice image, btw.

Indeed, but when a poster is posting BS critique, just basically putting words down for the sake of taking up space and then drawing a number from a hat (so to speak) there is no meaningful anything going around. It turns into one of those FlickR "Comment on my Stream" groups where the most meaningful comment you get is "nice exposure."

Ron,

I see nothing of real interest in this photo. It is well exposed, but it honestly looks like a tourist snapshot from a typical "on-the-ground" perspective. 6/10 (because it's still well exposed)

Little bit more artsy on this one:


IMG_6157-2 by Lyonsroar91, on Flickr

 

[Ron Evers]

Lyon got in between. Re. bridge shot: landscape would be more appropriate because you are cutting off the stays to the right. 6/10

 

[lyonsroar]

Lyon got in between. Re. bridge shot: landscape would be more appropriate because you are cutting off the stays to the right. 6/10

nvr mind.

 

[ulrichsd]

Indeed, but when a poster is posting BS critique, just basically putting words down for the sake of taking up space and then drawing a number from a hat (so to speak) there is no meaningful anything going around. It turns into one of those FlickR "Comment on my Stream" groups where the most meaningful comment you get is "nice exposure."

I assumed your were referring to my feedback with your comment since it was under my post, but then reread what I wrote about not agreeing with all the scores and figure you are making a general comment.

Thanks for the feedback. I like the backgrounds btw, but agree with Ron that I'd prefer landscape orientation (for the first one).

 

[kundalini]

Alright lyonsroar, you've been rated so I'll just post another photo to get us back on track.

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

As per how it goes on TPF...(lyon, I love your shot in #113 and think it works well as is)

 

[TwoTwoLeft]

The vignette brings nothing to the table. It would look better without. It's composed well, sharp and I dig the lighting. 7.234745535/10




Edit: That was meant for lyonsroar.

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

May I make a suggestion, from a Schwetty game?

Immediately post your claim to rate an image, then go back edit your rating and image in. Might stop some confusion.

Schwetty, you should revive your game! It was fun, but no one played.