What's new

Rate the photo above you

OPPS, JsHn got in before I finished.



I feel the negative space is on the wrong side since your subject is looking left. In fact, he's looking too far left (his right) making the eyeballs crowd the corners. Preferable to have some white on either side of the cornea. The rock ???, I' clone it out. I would try lightening up the background to add some detail. 6/10





Removed photo from later consideration.
 
Last edited:
The textures in this one are awesome. focus seems to be on the feet, should ideally be in the eyes. DOP is very nice, imho. Sharp. That finger is a very good scale reference point. I really like it. Harsh sunlight, I just don't like that shadow the finger is casting. Also, you cut off the top of the turtle, and one of it's toes. (?) A bit dark on the left side. If this was staged, a reflector would've helped. If not, perhaps a little dogding would help. Anyway, me gusta! muchos. Taking points from shadows, cropping off parts and focus. 6.7/10


IMG_0850 edit by Bokehliciousness-ness, on Flickr

f/2.2
1/3200th
ISO-100
EC +1/3

whoops, kundalini beat me to it :(
 
6/10

The image is a little too busy and it seems like the yellow color in the background flower were blown.

5797575599_42eec9c118_z.jpg
 
Most of body is quite underexposed and I think there is way, way too much empty space. 4/10 for sharpness and actually getting close enough to get teh shot

(I think TCD photography's monitor might be a little bright. She rates the squirrel above hers as underexposed and it looks perfect or even slightly overexposed on my screen.)


buddhasincave_-07986061413.jpg
 
Been gone all weekend so I'm just now jumping in. Fun idea! I'm a Traveler fan. This one is not one of my favorites but it's a 9/10. I love the curves, the mystery and the all over focus that was maintained. *Sorry my C&C's lack the skills of better communication!

And I totally agree on the squirrel. It is not underexposed and is quite a good capture. :thumbup:

Pods.jpg
 
I like this photo alot. Very sharp and attractive. I wish all the plant things in the foreground were in focus though. 8.5/10
BG-1.jpg

Espana
 
Last edited:
I don't have a clue what you have gone for in the shot, the out of focus hand at the front is off putting 4/10

263786843_dNAgW-M.jpg
 
pardon the interruption but that's a chipmunk, not a squirrel. just sayin.

carry on...
 
EDIT: I rated this picture but somebody bit me to it while typing. I'm leaving it like that cuz he/she didn't include the reasons why gave that rating ;) . Deleting my picture.


EDIT #2: My picture back up.


Great shot. There's a lot I can talk about this picture, happened so quick that the people wasn't aware what was going on, part of the windshield already gone and shown in the ground, dirt flying off the wheel.... 9/10 just because a bit underexposed.



Cake by eugalde13, on Flickr


For some reason in my Mac and iPhone looks good but in regular laptop looks overexposed. Not an snapshot.
 
Last edited:
Post the reason you chose that number. Otherwise it's just a random number
.



Protip:

When you are going to post a critique on a photo, first make a placeholder post that says something like "edit" and then go back and re-edit your post with the information. This will prevent overlapping.

Awesome rally pic BTW!

The cake shot looks like a snapshot. It does not appear level and the WB is on the cool side. It is focused correctly so 5/10.


IMG_1071 by Lyonsroar91, on Flickr
 
VERY nice. Can't see any problems with it. Love the vignetting. 10/10

letters.jpg
 
Mm 6/10 nice textures not sure what you're going for with it though it doesn't speak to me



Took this in the woods today, i like the angle but i know something is missing, i wanted it to be spookier but couldn't really figure out what it needed



 
Last edited:

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom