What's new

Raw, Jpeg, or Raw+Jpeg

What format do you shoot in?

  • raw

    Votes: 47 64.4%
  • jpeg

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • raw+jpeg

    Votes: 21 28.8%

  • Total voters
    73
Just Raw. Occasionally, just JPEG.

Every Raw file has a JPEG Basic embedded in it. That JPEG Basic is what is shown on the rear LCD, since until the Raw file is converted the Raw file isn't an image. Any histogram the camera shows you is also from that embedded in the Raw file JPEG Basic.

So shooting Raw + JPEG you have a Raw file and 2 JPEG files.
 
It depends.. lately just RAW, as I'm working in studio and such like.. when taking ordinary pics of family, friends, quick pics etc and no need to update them that much then JPEG.. smth like this, I think
 
Film -- the original RAW format :greenpbl:
 
RAW is a file format, not a religion. :lol:

Seriously, it's ultimately irrelevant as to what "everyone else does". A thread like this can make it appear (to those who may not know better) that you MUST shoot in RAW if you want to call yourself a true photog. And some obviously revel in this and like to rub it in. But it's just not true.

This is an individual matter of what works best for you, your circumstances, your goals. If you are a professional and this is what you do for a living, you must have the best possible image by any means, have oodles of time to sit around and pay careful attention to post processing, RAW is obviously the way to go.

If you're an enthusiast like myself I think JPEG is just FINE.

I liken it to the guitar world. There's lots of folks who want you to believe you have to play a Martin or a Gibson if you want to sound your best. The essential thing to them is the kind of guitar you have, not how well you play. Fact is, the really great players don't obsess about gear because they can make a plywood box sound incredible. I'm sure this is analogous to great photogs who can dazzle you with a point and shoot. In other words, it's far more important to pay attention to the art form rather than the gear.

that's just my .02
 
A thread like this can make it appear (to those who may not know better) that you MUST shoot in RAW if you want to call yourself a true photog
LOL but you must :lol:
 
RAW. I shoot in RAW.

You can't be a real photographer unless you shoot in RAW. I think it's outlined in the book of Leviticus somewhere.
 
To me it depends. Snap shots or shots that aren't, you know, compositional thought through, I shoot in JPEG. The opposite in RAW format.
 
Good to know. Frankly, I don't have a good organizational system, so a lot of my pictures just sit around dormant in RAW (NEF in my case) form. I'd like to keep all of the RAW files, essentially for archival purposes, but various dng conversions result in sidecar files, which only add to the organizational burden....all this before I've even done any serious processing, let alone tiff or jpeg copies.

I guess I need to just make the effort, but I would love to hear some more strategies. I've finally got my iTunes library where I want it, now on to the photos.

It's really important to have a good organizational system for your photos for a variety of reasons. The big one is simply being able to find a photo. It also makes backing up easier and things like that.

First, let's make something clear. If I don't have at least 2 copies of an image somewhere (on different drives, of course) then I don't consider myself having one. Backing up is so important. There are books written on the topic of how to do it, so find a solution that works for you and use it. Several months ago we had a forum member here lose (if I remember correctly) a year or two worth of photos because they weren't backed up and a family member formatted the hard drive. Don't let that happen to you!

About organization, it's worth the time you spend organizing your photos. And remember, the longer you wait to do it, the longer it will take to organize. My method is fairly straight forward. I have a folder for the year. Inside there, I have folders for each month. Then, inside there, I have folders for each 'shoot' I did.

For example, I went on a hike with my wife and daughter last week end up Indian River. So I have a folder inside my January folder called "2011_01_29_Indian_River_Hike." Inside that folder are my RAW's from that event, and two other folders. The other folders are named "Master" and "Output." My file names follow the format <Date>_<Event>_XXXX.dng where XXXX is a counter that identifies each individual image. So for the folder I named above, the name of the first image in the set is "20110129_Indian_River_Hike_0001.dng". The master folder uses the same convention, but is a .tif instead. The output folder looks similar, but adds a tag after the counter to tell what it's used for. So, the web version of the file I mentioned above would look like this, "20110129_Indian_River_Hike_0001_Web.jpg". If I made one to print as an 8x10, it would looke like this, "20110129_Indian_River_Hike_0001_8x10.jpg".

Photoshop can rename your images in batches, I'm sure other photo editing software can also. A program called Irfanware will do it also. I use Bridge to do my renaming when I import and convert to dng. What I use isn't what's best for everyone. It works well for me, and that's all I can say. Find a way of organizing that works for you, and stick with it. It's well worth the extra bit of work getting it set up.
 
Thanks Gaerek for the detailed reply. As far as lumping files into when they were created, that's no biggy...they tend to be lumped into discrete shoots. Also, I backup to my whole system(s) to external drives using time machine, which is truly enterprise-class backup software.

I read frequently about how lightroom is such a boon for organization, however honestly, the cost to purchase, and then the effort to learn the new software (and tag everything and whatever else it can do) just isn't worth it to me. I think I'll stick with an approach that entails manually organizing. Thanks again for writing up your strategy.
 
RAW. I use Lightroom to handle my catalog so none of the files are altered. No reason to shoot any JPegs if you have the RAW files...just becomes redundant.
 
yea, I usually upload into lightroom, do my pp between lightroom and photoshop then export the finished files to iphoto to organize. keeps things nice for me, lightroom has unedited photos, iphoto has my finished ones.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom