JustJazzie
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 3,793
- Reaction score
- 1,732
- Location
- Bailey, Colorado
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I took a lens into a semi local shop to try and sell it, and my husband was nice enough to point out the Sigma macro that I had overlooked....they seem to have a good price on it at $425 I am very tempted to go back and get it....
I did read something in a blog though, about it being "too shallow" of a DOF due to focal length. But I would think the extra focusing distance (15 inches vs 9) would even things out. So, I am wondering if this would be ideal for my water drop pictures or not. I would also likely use it as a portrait lens. Would a 105 be better?
I haven't even heard of this lens until this evening, but I am hoping one of you has some insight for me.
Thanks in advance!
Ps: does anyone have issues with the search function? I did search for sigma 150 macro before posting, and didn't get many hits. Now I see under "similar threads," lots to browse! Hmm...
I did read something in a blog though, about it being "too shallow" of a DOF due to focal length. But I would think the extra focusing distance (15 inches vs 9) would even things out. So, I am wondering if this would be ideal for my water drop pictures or not. I would also likely use it as a portrait lens. Would a 105 be better?
I haven't even heard of this lens until this evening, but I am hoping one of you has some insight for me.
Thanks in advance!
Ps: does anyone have issues with the search function? I did search for sigma 150 macro before posting, and didn't get many hits. Now I see under "similar threads," lots to browse! Hmm...
Last edited: