KreGg
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2011
- Messages
- 90
- Reaction score
- 19
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
So as I learn more and more about my lenses and when to use a given aperture, I decided to take my idle time right now and do some tests.
Having read lots of people experiencing back or front focusing or softness with this camera, I decided I should try mine. It seems that the quality control ain't the best.
I know there was a thread here from 2008,
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/photography-equipment-products/117121-tamron-28-75-f-2-8-sharpness-test-wide-open-stopped-down-zoom-extremes.html
with some shots from this lens. But I decided to re-make it to test mine. And since I ve got some pics, I decided to share with anyone who might find it useful.
The subject is a cotton coat. The camera was mounted on a tripod. Aperture priority mode. All shots on the biggest focal length (75mm):
First pic is the smallest aperture it goes, f/32, no crops:
Second pic is of f/8.0, no crops:
Third picture is of f/2.8, no crops:
I think all are pretty sharp. With the edge going to f 8.0. I won't bother posting the other apertures, cause they pretty much look the same with no crops.
Now to the 100% crops. Here we can see great differences on extremes:
f/32, 100% crop:
f/16, 100% crop:
f/8.0, 100% crop:
f/5.6, 100% crop:
f/4.0, 100% crop:
f/2.8, 100% crop:
If we crop that much, we can definitely see that 2.8 is MUCH softer than the other apertures. Though f/32 is close behind. But, to me, both are pretty much acceptable, knowing they are extremes.
But all the other apertures are tack sharp from what I can see.
I was trying some night photography the other night, but I realized I had my aperture at 2.8 on all pictures. Since I have a tripod and I was shooting still objects, now I know I should have closed the aperture a bit more to get a little extra sharpness.
But my eyes are nowhere trained. I know the middle apertures sharpness are good. But how about my 2.8 aperture? Is it too soft? Or I got a good copy?
Having read lots of people experiencing back or front focusing or softness with this camera, I decided I should try mine. It seems that the quality control ain't the best.
I know there was a thread here from 2008,
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/photography-equipment-products/117121-tamron-28-75-f-2-8-sharpness-test-wide-open-stopped-down-zoom-extremes.html
with some shots from this lens. But I decided to re-make it to test mine. And since I ve got some pics, I decided to share with anyone who might find it useful.
The subject is a cotton coat. The camera was mounted on a tripod. Aperture priority mode. All shots on the biggest focal length (75mm):
First pic is the smallest aperture it goes, f/32, no crops:
Second pic is of f/8.0, no crops:
Third picture is of f/2.8, no crops:
I think all are pretty sharp. With the edge going to f 8.0. I won't bother posting the other apertures, cause they pretty much look the same with no crops.
Now to the 100% crops. Here we can see great differences on extremes:
f/32, 100% crop:
f/16, 100% crop:
f/8.0, 100% crop:
f/5.6, 100% crop:
f/4.0, 100% crop:
f/2.8, 100% crop:
If we crop that much, we can definitely see that 2.8 is MUCH softer than the other apertures. Though f/32 is close behind. But, to me, both are pretty much acceptable, knowing they are extremes.
But all the other apertures are tack sharp from what I can see.
I was trying some night photography the other night, but I realized I had my aperture at 2.8 on all pictures. Since I have a tripod and I was shooting still objects, now I know I should have closed the aperture a bit more to get a little extra sharpness.
But my eyes are nowhere trained. I know the middle apertures sharpness are good. But how about my 2.8 aperture? Is it too soft? Or I got a good copy?