- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,726
- Reaction score
- 5,467
- Website
- sm4him.500px.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Oh, huh, I *might* have just given a teeny little clue as to what *I* think of this.
So, Tennessee's governor decided the state needed a new logo--supposedly, this was a move to "give the state a more unified look on signs and letterhead." (quote from the Gov).
New Tennessee Logo Aims for Consistency Elicits Mockery Adweek
A LOT of people are up in arms about the $46,000 cost of the new logo, but that's not my main problem with it. Good graphic design, like good photography, costs money.
The problem is: This, imo, is NOT good graphic design. This looks like it took someone about 45 seconds to think up and another 90 seconds to create. It's made worse by the fact that I have yet to see anything other than a fuzzy copy of it that looks like a low-res mess.
In my opinion, the governor really missed a golden opportunity here, anyway. Why not run a statewide contest for a new logo? Heck, offer a $15,000 award to the winning design and you would still have saved over $30K, and probably had a whole passel of logos that were magnitudes better than this thing!
So--especially for those of you outside my fair state--what do YOU think?
Old logo on left, new logo on right:
So, Tennessee's governor decided the state needed a new logo--supposedly, this was a move to "give the state a more unified look on signs and letterhead." (quote from the Gov).
New Tennessee Logo Aims for Consistency Elicits Mockery Adweek
A LOT of people are up in arms about the $46,000 cost of the new logo, but that's not my main problem with it. Good graphic design, like good photography, costs money.
The problem is: This, imo, is NOT good graphic design. This looks like it took someone about 45 seconds to think up and another 90 seconds to create. It's made worse by the fact that I have yet to see anything other than a fuzzy copy of it that looks like a low-res mess.
In my opinion, the governor really missed a golden opportunity here, anyway. Why not run a statewide contest for a new logo? Heck, offer a $15,000 award to the winning design and you would still have saved over $30K, and probably had a whole passel of logos that were magnitudes better than this thing!
So--especially for those of you outside my fair state--what do YOU think?
Old logo on left, new logo on right: