one thing i don't know after reading this thread in particular... is. what the hell does OP mean?
thanks
I don't know, I think it's a pretty simple problem with a pretty simple answer.
A person with low talent will take equally bad/good photos with a PointnShoot and a $1500 SLR.
Only a talented person will be held back by the considerable physical limitations of the PointnShoot.
If you think pictures of equal quality can be taken with both systems, then you don't have an understanding of the difference; there are important differences, which only a knowledgeable person will be able to take advantage of.

Well said.
I would like to nominate Drew's post the thread-ender.
![]()
But yet the sky is blown as well as highlights on the ground, there is a tilt of the horizon, the top of the hedge is running through their heads, dead leaves that cover the hem of her gown and I would think an f/1.2 lens would produce a much more buttery bokeh than shown.
Could someone with a P&S get a better composition? Most likey.
stop being such an arrogant prick and be nice like all of us.
i guess none of you know what a point n shoot is capable of... Ive taken and seen MANY point n shoot pics that blow SLR pics out of the water. its the eye, the time, and the settings, not just the label and cost of a camera.. you guys will soon learn that.. People are to quick to go out and buy a 2k camera when they havent even mastered a polaroid..
moral of this post when i see post saying (wow thats a nice shot cant believe its from a PnS) you look stupid to me...
Thanks..
I don't think this was very nice![]()