Too HDR?

[spacefuzz]

looks fine to me, nice processing.

 

[Over Exposed]

I don't generally like HDR but this is on the acceptable side of the line!

There is a line? :er:

 

[tmartin2347]

I like that a lot, awesome job.

 

[johnpaul]

Hi,

I know what you mean by the line... it's easy to go overboard with HDR, but I believe it is ho the final image looks to the viewer that counts. No matter ho much post processing there is.

Your image looks great the HDR has done it's job well,but the original image is also good (well lit).

JP

 

[mwesley]

Based on what HDR is meant to be, your image is fantastic. HDR can obviously be implemented to create a wide range of effects, but it's purpose is mainly to provide a high dynamic range photograph ... like the photographs of Ansel Adams. So, there absolutely IS a "correct" HDR image; although, as mentioned above, there is so much subjectivity involved in the art of photography, any technicality can be acceptably breached in order to produce whatever image you wish to create ... so, in that regard, there are no "rules" per se. Technically speaking, though, HDR is meant to render tonally correct, perfectly exposed images ... what we do with it beyond that is subject to perception and desire. Technically speaking, your HDR image is very well done ... at least to my eye.

 

[480sparky]

If I was asked if this was or wasn't an HDR, I'd have to say no.

If 'possible' was added to my choices, then it would be possible.

But without knowing for sure it's an HDR, then I would never be able to say so.

 

[edwardmendes]

I think the image is a good example of HDR done well.

 

[inaka]

Very well done shot.
Excellent processing.