- Joined
- Jul 3, 2004
- Messages
- 3,714
- Reaction score
- 531
- Location
- Here N There
- Website
- img24.photobucket.com
I have always used a 3-way pan mount that came with my old tripod, a trusty Slik. It's not exactly heavy duty, but very durable and relatively light weight. I like 3 way pan heads because I can adjust one angle at a time, gives me better control.
I've used old fashioned ball mount as well as pistol grip mount. Didn't like them.
Recently I bought a new tripod and realized that a compact 3-way pan mount is not popular anymore and I couldn't find one that is as small as what I had. So I settled for the more popular type, the ball mount that has torsion adjustment. Now this is a new concept to me(quite a bit out dated). When using the 3-way pan head as well as traditional ball mount, I have to tighten the grip to lock the camera's position. With this torsion mechanism, I am not supposed to dead-lock the camera, but give it enough tightness so it doesn't move on its own weight, and I still can adjust it by moving it. It took a while to understand this as the store gal was trying to explain how it works.
So I bought it and decided to give it a try (along with a set of CF legs for pretty good discount). I haven't taken it out to the wild to really put it to test, but after having to take a few macro shots indoor(having to make very small position adjustments), I don't think this is any better than a 3-way pan design. Perhaps I am still trying to get used to it. I think the only reason why this is more popular than the 3-way is the compactness, which I am not convinced either.
BTW the ball mount is Aoka Ok-10 and the legs are Triopo GT-1681, together for about USD$270. My old Slik aluminum set was less than USD$100.
So my current ultimate preference is a 3-way pan. What's yours?
I've used old fashioned ball mount as well as pistol grip mount. Didn't like them.
Recently I bought a new tripod and realized that a compact 3-way pan mount is not popular anymore and I couldn't find one that is as small as what I had. So I settled for the more popular type, the ball mount that has torsion adjustment. Now this is a new concept to me(quite a bit out dated). When using the 3-way pan head as well as traditional ball mount, I have to tighten the grip to lock the camera's position. With this torsion mechanism, I am not supposed to dead-lock the camera, but give it enough tightness so it doesn't move on its own weight, and I still can adjust it by moving it. It took a while to understand this as the store gal was trying to explain how it works.
So I bought it and decided to give it a try (along with a set of CF legs for pretty good discount). I haven't taken it out to the wild to really put it to test, but after having to take a few macro shots indoor(having to make very small position adjustments), I don't think this is any better than a 3-way pan design. Perhaps I am still trying to get used to it. I think the only reason why this is more popular than the 3-way is the compactness, which I am not convinced either.
BTW the ball mount is Aoka Ok-10 and the legs are Triopo GT-1681, together for about USD$270. My old Slik aluminum set was less than USD$100.
So my current ultimate preference is a 3-way pan. What's yours?