I'm pretty sure that any tripod you get for $75, or $100 or whatever, you will eventually find was a waste of $75. The whole job of a tripod is to hold the camera steady, and a great many tripods on the market can't even do this, they just hold the camera. How robust a tripod you need depends on the weight of what you want to support with it, so if you're just shooting a rebel with a 50, you'll need much less tripod than a 1D with a 300. If you're willing to sacrifice weight and finer ergonomic design, there are definitely options available that will be sturdy, and still cheaper than some of the models built to be sturdy as well as portable / adaptable / etc... I don't have any experience with specific models, someone else can chime in there, but when you research, look for stability above all else. If you want to save money, then don't pay for extra features, but make sure you still get something rock solid, or you won't be satisfied.