Infidel
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 21, 2010
- Messages
- 490
- Reaction score
- 22
- Location
- Western MA
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
The ND filters will tone down very bright areas so the camera recording range is not overloaded. i.e prevent detailless bright or dark areas.
I don't understand how a ND filter can selectively tone down very bright areas without also darkening shadows....unless you are referring to a graduated ND filter. It is my understanding that a ND filter does not compress the luminance range, rather it shifts the entire histogram to the left, independent of relative brightness. The same effect (on the histogram, that is) can be obtained by reducing the exposure via aperture, shutter speed, or ISO. ND filters are typically used to enable slower shutter speeds or larger apertures (for creative effects) in bright lighting conditions.
Maybe there is something missing from my understanding; could you (or anyone else) please explain how this works?
You are mostly correct and also lacking creativity. If you were creative you could answer your own question.
For example when shooting into the setting sun I will use several non graduated ND filters (10 or more stops) hand held to line up the bottom edge with the horizon. And no, the camera cannot focus on the edges of the filters so it don't show.
Creativity? Cut out a small circle of an ND filter (like a welding shade) stick it to a clear piece of glass and tone down a moon. If anyone just gasped in horror at the thought of degraded image quality then I again refer to this link. Dirty lens article
I assumed you were referring to conventional use of ND filters by screwing them to the lens filter mount. There is a misconception floating around on the internet that ND filters can effectively compress luminance range (tone down highlights, ect). The use you're referring to, in my view, corresponds more closely to that of a graduated ND filter, which similarly attenuates light in only part of the image.
FWIW, I'm not sure the jab at my creativity was really necessary; I certainly didn't mean to ruffle any feathers with my post. I don't know...maybe you were just trying to be helpful, but it came across as a bit pedantic. I was merely asking for clarification, which you have now provided, so thanks.