Ben-71
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Messages
- 203
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Israel
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
<< Yeah I'm speaking generally here. In nearly all situations you would not need them, but I have had a few shots of film go blue when photographing snow before because of the high UV exposure. >>This is becoming boring, as I agree with you again...
UV blocking is also importatnt to wedding phot', as some of the cloths of those white dresses emit so much UV that they turn bluish in the photographs.
<< ... any anti-IR filter you put on your camera that isn't specifically customised exactly for the sensor is likely to have either no effect at all, or may turn the image bluish. Letting through some of the IR spectra to the sensor (D70 does this) may help the sensor produce a normal image. >>With a D300, I saw no difference w/ or w/o IR blocking.
<< .... I saw one saying that the Thinner glass makes it more suited for digital cameras. I mean what the...
>>
The "more suited for digital cameras" is indeed ridiculous, but the principle is true.
The wider the angle of view, the more glass light passes when it comes from the side, vs light from the front.
| /
-------------------
-------------------
| /
This means trouble at the edges.
So, thinner filter glass is better, but for film as well.
We'll probably agree on that too