Video every newbie wanting to start a photo business should watch.

[480sparky40 39]

First maker of such a setting will be a big winner.

And will provoke the ire of professional wedding photographers.

I really don't think the major manufacturers have an individual segment of the photography industry high on their list of concerns. They are in the camera selling insustry.

 

[timor]

I really don't think the major manufacturers have an individual segment of the photography industry high on their list of concerns. They are in the camera selling insustry.

Don't you see it ? We have cameras better for sport, better for portraits, better for street. Why not to make camera "better for weddings" ? And grab the money of believers . For all the so called photographers in the world 95% are just show offs and hacks interested only in glory ( ) or money.

 

[480sparky40 39]

I really don't think the major manufacturers have an individual segment of the photography industry high on their list of concerns. They are in the camera selling insustry.

Don't you see it ? We have cameras better for sport, better for portraits, better for street. Why not to make camera "better for weddings" ? And grab the money of believers . For all the so called photographers in the world 95% are just show offs and hacks interested only in glory ( ) or money.

We have better cameras.

The makers don't give a rodents' rectum what we use them for.

 

[timor]

I really don't think the major manufacturers have an individual segment of the photography industry high on their list of concerns. They are in the camera selling insustry.

Don't you see it ? We have cameras better for sport, better for portraits, better for street. Why not to make camera "better for weddings" ? And grab the money of believers . For all the so called photographers in the world 95% are just show offs and hacks interested only in glory ( ) or money.

We have better cameras.

The makers don't give a rodents' rectum what we use them for.

Not true. If so we would still be shooting Brownies. And as you surely noticed Brownies have all possible shooting settings amalgamated in one truly universal mode. Wedding mode included.

 

[480sparky40 39]

I really don't think the major manufacturers have an individual segment of the photography industry high on their list of concerns. They are in the camera selling insustry.

Don't you see it ? We have cameras better for sport, better for portraits, better for street. Why not to make camera "better for weddings" ? And grab the money of believers . For all the so called photographers in the world 95% are just show offs and hacks interested only in glory ( ) or money.

We have better cameras.

The makers don't give a rodents' rectum what we use them for.

Not true. If so we would still be shooting Brownies. And as you surely noticed Brownies have all possible shooting settings amalgamated in one truly universal mode. Wedding mode included.

You mean there's a better camera than the one I have now?

 

[table1349]

I really don't think the major manufacturers have an individual segment of the photography industry high on their list of concerns. They are in the camera selling insustry.

Don't you see it ? We have cameras better for sport, better for portraits, better for street. Why not to make camera "better for weddings" ? And grab the money of believers . For all the so called photographers in the world 95% are just show offs and hacks interested only in glory ( ) or money.

We have better cameras.

The makers don't give a rodents' rectum what we use them for.

Not true. If so we would still be shooting Brownies. And as you surely noticed Brownies have all possible shooting settings amalgamated in one truly universal mode. Wedding mode included.

I still do on occasion. I have my Great grandmother's Brownie 2c in my small collection and it still works. The image quality is nothing compared to modern digitals or even good quality film camera, but it is fun to shoot once in a while.

 

[timor]

I really don't think the major manufacturers have an individual segment of the photography industry high on their list of concerns. They are in the camera selling insustry.

Don't you see it ? We have cameras better for sport, better for portraits, better for street. Why not to make camera "better for weddings" ? And grab the money of believers . For all the so called photographers in the world 95% are just show offs and hacks interested only in glory ( ) or money.

We have better cameras.

The makers don't give a rodents' rectum what we use them for.

Not true. If so we would still be shooting Brownies. And as you surely noticed Brownies have all possible shooting settings amalgamated in one truly universal mode. Wedding mode included.

You mean there's a better camera than the one I have now?

Well, that`s the first prototype of digital camera. Little birdy has a CPU in his head, sensor in his eye and beak to create pixels. This model did not survived long, now we have faster birds with better quality beaks. This weddings photographers are using now. But we still need a wedding camera, which will refuse to `click`if the composition is `wrong`, or the light, or no smile and notify photographer about that. Maybe via e-mail, or better yet text message. Maybe camera should also start to laugh, when photographer will attempt to take such a wrong picture. Maybe we will reach such a perfection when photographer will place 20 or so motorized lights in the church and camera computer will turn them on, move them around and control the volume of light according to what camera is pointed at. Heck, maybe we will not need any photographer at all, camera will levitate in the air by the way of noiseless drone and take pictures, whenever computer recognizes THE DECISIVE MOMENT. But here one thought hit me: will cyborgs and androids still wed in the churches ?

 

[timor]

Scary vision ? Well, we are on good way to create THE MATRIX, a software controlled reality.