Jeremy Z
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2007
- Messages
- 1,179
- Reaction score
- 32
- Location
- Chicago burbs
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Yes, and even that is too much. I'd pay maybe $25 for one. They can get away with it because it is the only new TLR made these days. I bet Yashica would make a killing if they brought back the Yashica-Mats at a reasonable price.She's holding a Seagull TLR. I was intrigued, and opening to the first page, I find they have them for sale, for the amazingly expensive price of $295. B&H sells them for $139.
When I worked at Central Camera Co., we had students coming in all the time buying the damned things. We had a whole rack full of nice Yashica-Mats and Rolleiflexes, but the worry about them needing repair, parts, and their slightly-higher price always a deal-breaker for the starving students. These kids are spending all of their money, and some of their parents' on tuition and rent.
I tried hard to sell the proper 6x6 TLRs, but only managed to sell one for every 5 Seagulls. It was a personal defeat for me.
The cameras don't have to be particularly good. The mechanism is simple, the lens is cheap, probably even plastic. The fact that the negative is 2 1/2 times bigger than a 35mm neg means better enlargements anyhow. They wouldn't hold a candle to a Yashica-Mat, but they're good enough, and will last through a 16 week course. By golly if the Chinese didn't crack that formula.