e.rose
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 4,789
- Reaction score
- 1,985
- Location
- Nashville, Tn
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Well, the guy says the lens is NOT that sharp...but it has a lovely transition from the focus zone to the out of focus background, and he likes it on an APS-C Canon body, where it in effect becomes more of a "true normal" lens...so that might be part of the reason. As he mentions, a lot of people value sharpness, but for him, the quality he likes is the way the 28/1.8 "draws the scene"...I suspect that using it wider-open on FF would maybe not yield the same look as on a 1.6x body. I liked his use of the term "unreliably great," which is an interesting way to put it.
Sharpness can be wayyyy overrated; look at the Zeiss Planar 50mm f/1.4 formula and the results outta those things...OMG...sharp, yes! But hoooooorible background rendering. Uuuuugly. Triple-bagger ugly. Gag me with a double-line bokeh spoon ugly.
I've heard Canon's 20mm prime is really a great lens, but not many people talk about it.
Well... sharpness isn't everything, no, but in general, I like the 24-70 because it's sharp *and* it looks nice overall.
The 28 is not a bad lens at all.. but I would sell it in a heartbeat to put towards a 24-70 if I had the rest of the money to get one.

I'll sell it to you when I'm ready.
:lmao: