Dao
No longer a newbie, moving up!
I am thinking about getting a used Canon EF 70-200m F/4L lens. When I look around, there are newer or older one out there. If assuming the lenses are in mint condition like no physical/visible damge and able to take good photos . But one clams as few months old with 1000 shots and the other one claim as few years old with, lets say, 10000 shots.
Beside the price difference, what will be the main difference between the two? Is it the few years old lens need more service since it is older? Or in general, we need to take the lens to the Canon service service center once in awhile to have them do some maintenance, so in that case, it doesn't really matter that much? Or those lens usually is maintenance free and the few years old one usually will last very long as well (in general).
Thanks
Beside the price difference, what will be the main difference between the two? Is it the few years old lens need more service since it is older? Or in general, we need to take the lens to the Canon service service center once in awhile to have them do some maintenance, so in that case, it doesn't really matter that much? Or those lens usually is maintenance free and the few years old one usually will last very long as well (in general).
Thanks