I think both of those are difficult to read.
What if you need white, or some other color of border, than black.
That's why I get paid the big bucks.I think both of those are difficult to read.
What if you need white, or some other color of border, than black.
Hmmmm... interesting point... didn't even cross my mind.
Then on that score, you're good to go. :thumbup:Well they are Vector,
Then on that score, you're good to go. :thumbup:Well they are Vector,
I used to go through Hemet pretty frequently in the mid-70's - early 80's, on my way from Coronado up to Idyllwild to rock climb at Tahquitz and Suicide rocks. - Tahquitz - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Then on that score, you're good to go. :thumbup:Well they are Vector,
I used to go through Hemet pretty frequently in the mid-70's - early 80's, on my way from Coronado up to Idyllwild to rock climb at Tahquitz and Suicide rocks. - Tahquitz - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As someone very experienced in post-production, I have a couple small suggestions.
A serif font will definitely look very professional. It does however usually have a bit of a, "Look, I'm a fancy-pants serious photographer man" feel to it, so if your marketing strategy is less fancy-pants and more "I'm a casual awesome fellow who also takes awesome photographs," I would avoid it.
My only other complaint is that in your two examples, both signatures are a little hard to read - the first because it looks like the opacity is turned down, and the second because of the stroke. I would suggest just a simple, flat white signature. (I also highly approve of you putting it on the border instead of directly on the image.)
![]()
From top to bottom those typefaces are Market Deco, Trajan Pro, Georgia, Times New Roman, and Imperator. The top two I think would go well with your images.