White balance issues with continuous lighting studio

[MTVision]

I'm a rookie, and should be slapped silly for this. I should never use such a small A for studio work. I'm such a dum-dum. What was I thinking, especially after you already told me this! It take 2 times for it to sink in. I GET IT NOW, got it?!

Defensive much?

He wanted to know the reasoning behind it. Is that so hard to get? You obviously set it to 19 for a reason - just because I said you didn't need it that small doesn't mean you can't use that aperture. It was too small for that situation because you had to use your pop up flash. There is usually always a reason why you choose a specific aperture/SS.

And actually smallish apertures are used in a studio - your lights aren't powerful enough.

 

[Bossy]

​

 

[luvmyfamily]

geez

 

[mishele]

 

[luvmyfamily]

Hey, i love that song!

 

[luvmyfamily]

You're so bossy, Bossy, lol

 

[blackrose89]

I'm a rookie, and should be slapped silly for this. I should never use such a small A for studio work. I'm such a dum-dum. What was I thinking, especially after you already told me this! It take 2 times for it to sink in. I GET IT NOW, got it?!

Defensive much?

He wanted to know the reasoning behind it. Is that so hard to get? You obviously set it to 19 for a reason - just because I said you didn't need it that small doesn't mean you can't use that aperture. It was too small for that situation because you had to use your pop up flash. There is usually always a reason why you choose a specific aperture/SS.

And actually smallish apertures are used in a studio - your lights aren't powerful enough.

I could be wrong and I am NOT saying anything either way on how I feel about the debate or whatever is going on here, but I think Luv said she just picked a random setting. From what she said there was no reason for setting. She wasn't worried about creating a complete photograph, just solely focused on working with ther WB issue so she set her aparture to whatever. That's the impression I got anyway. I'm out

 

[luvmyfamily]

I'm a rookie, and should be slapped silly for this. I should never use such a small A for studio work. I'm such a dum-dum. What was I thinking, especially after you already told me this! It take 2 times for it to sink in. I GET IT NOW, got it?!

Defensive much?

He wanted to know the reasoning behind it. Is that so hard to get? You obviously set it to 19 for a reason - just because I said you didn't need it that small doesn't mean you can't use that aperture. It was too small for that situation because you had to use your pop up flash. There is usually always a reason why you choose a specific aperture/SS.

And actually smallish apertures are used in a studio - your lights aren't powerful enough.

I could be wrong and I am NOT saying anything either way on how I feel about the debate or whatever is going on here, but I think Luv said she just picked a random setting. She wasn't worried about creating a complete photographed, just solely focused on working with ther WB issue so she set her aparture to whatever.

Someone who gets it......

 

[MTVision]

I could be wrong and I am NOT saying anything either way on how I feel about the debate or whatever is going on here, but I think Luv said she just picked a random setting. She wasn't worried about creating a complete photograph, just solely focused on working with ther WB issue so she set her aparture to whatever. That's the impression I got anyway. I'm out

. If it was just a test shot and you chose it randomly - that's all you had to say.

Stop getting so defensive - even if someone says something rude - just ignore it. Not that big of a deal.

Nobody said she didn't know what aperture was - she just jumped to conclusions. How hard is it to say you chose something randomly? So IMO - she is being defensive. Anything said that she doesn't like - or she reads into - is somebody being rude or sarcastic or whatever.

 

[MTVision]

This was playing around with the white balance in my studio under continuous tungsten light. This is WHY I switched to auto white balance...it didn't do this anymore. I had it set to manual white balance tungsten light because that is what light I was using.

Exposure time, sec: 1/60
Aperture (F): 19.00
ISO speed rating: 800
Lens focal length, mm: 34.0
Aperture (APEX): 19.0
Shutter speed (APEX): 0.0156 (1/64)
Exposure mode: Manual exposure
White balance: Manual white balance

People aren't mind readers either. So maybe next time tell people you just randomly chose settings with no thought process instead of just saying you were playing around with white balance. Then maybe people won't ask questions that offend you.......

 

[blackrose89]

I could be wrong and I am NOT saying anything either way on how I feel about the debate or whatever is going on here, but I think Luv said she just picked a random setting. She wasn't worried about creating a complete photograph, just solely focused on working with ther WB issue so she set her aparture to whatever. That's the impression I got anyway. I'm out

. If it was just a test shot and you chose it randomly - that's all you had to say.

Stop getting so defensive - even if someone says something rude - just ignore it. Not that big of a deal.

Nobody said she didn't know what aperture was - she just jumped to conclusions. How hard is it to say you chose something randomly? So IMO - she is being defensive. Anything said that she doesn't like - or she reads into - is somebody being rude or sarcastic or whatever.

I'm not getting involved either way I was just saying what I think she was trying to articulate. Not saying I feel she is in the right here

 

[Bossy]

I could be wrong and I am NOT saying anything either way on how I feel about the debate or whatever is going on here, but I think Luv said she just picked a random setting. She wasn't worried about creating a complete photograph, just solely focused on working with ther WB issue so she set her aparture to whatever. That's the impression I got anyway. I'm out

. If it was just a test shot and you chose it randomly - that's all you had to say.

Stop getting so defensive - even if someone says something rude - just ignore it. Not that big of a deal.

Nobody said she didn't know what aperture was - she just jumped to conclusions. How hard is it to say you chose something randomly? So IMO - she is being defensive. Anything said that she doesn't like - or she reads into - is somebody being rude or sarcastic or whatever.

I'm not getting involved either way I was just saying what I think she was trying to articulate. Not saying I feel she is in the right here

Speaking for another person is kinda the definition of getting involved

​

 

[blackrose89]

Nobody said she didn't know what aperture was - she just jumped to conclusions. How hard is it to say you chose something randomly? So IMO - she is being defensive. Anything said that she doesn't like - or she reads into - is somebody being rude or sarcastic or whatever.

I'm not getting involved either way I was just saying what I think she was trying to articulate. Not saying I feel she is in the right here

Speaking for another person is kinda the definition of getting involved

I wasn't really speaking for another person more stating a fact. It's like if there was a car accident and someone in the accident was trying to describe a car color, someone comes and better articulates the car color, that person articulating is not saying either way who they feel caused the car accident, just a fact being explained better.

 

[cgipson1]

I'm not getting involved either way I was just saying what I think she was trying to articulate. Not saying I feel she is in the right here

i wasn't really speaking for another person more stating a fact. It's like if there was a car accident and someone in the accident was trying to describe a car color, someone comes and better articulates the car color, that person articulating is not saying either way who they feel caused the car accident, just a fact being explained better.

So what you think she was trying to articulate, is now a fact? lol! :greenpbl:

 

[blackrose89]

I'm not getting involved either way I was just saying what I think she was trying to articulate. Not saying I feel she is in the right here

i wasn't really speaking for another person more stating a fact. It's like if there was a car accident and someone in the accident was trying to describe a car color, someone comes and better articulates the car color, that person articulating is not saying either way who they feel caused the car accident, just a fact being explained better.

So what you think she was trying to articulate, is now a fact? lol! :greenpbl:

By fact I meant stating MY fact not hers. My fact being that fact I had an assumption of what she was saying. Ok I was helping her articulate her statement. IS that better?