AlanKlein
Been spending a lot of time on here!
In addition to extreme resolution, LF photography allow lens and film plane tilts and movements that extend DOF and straighten perspective that cannot be done with most smaller formats.
Maybe right. I found thisHow it compares ?Why they need this to be large format film photography ? Why digital is not good enough ? Is there any reason for it ?
My guess is resolution.
You can easily get a 600-800 megapixel image from a 8x10 negative.
Beats me. Its not my requirement so I can't answer for them.But what's the actual point? Where is that kind or resolution needed or warranted? Are they planning to print something the size of an IMAX screen but still want people to be able to put their nose 3" from it and still see detail?How it compares ?Why they need this to be large format film photography ? Why digital is not good enough ? Is there any reason for it ?
My guess is resolution.
To digital, yes.
You can easily get a 600-800 megapixel image from a 8x10 negative.
I can get 1.26gp out of a 4x5 neg. That's far more than any software I have is capable of handling. I have to choke it back to 600mp just to edit anything.
Do you think that's the reasoning behind this?In addition to extreme resolution, LF photography allow lens and film plane tilts and movements that extend DOF and straighten perspective that cannot be done with most smaller formats.