What's new

Why you (dont) need a 24-70mm

Solarflare

No longer a newbie, moving up!
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
2,903
Reaction score
395
I wont link that video because its the most awful video digitalrev has done to date.

But am I the only one who got the impression that what they actually wanted to say is that you DONT need a 24-70mm ?
 
LOL, not need 24-70mm 2.8 ?
To each his own but I gotta tell you its my most beloved and used lens.
I use it for everything, portrait (except head shots), landscape, event, general walk around, close up shots (well its not a macro but its good for a general use lens), low light situation.
I mean its just such a great optical range and offering such high quality images.
 
Didn't watch it, and not planning to, either. I unsubscribed a while ago. Their days of entertaining and useful videos are long gone; now they're failing on both.
 
24-70 is my most used non-portraiture jobs lens.
 
I own two lenses. 85 1.4 and 24-70

Well also the 150-600 but thats just collecting dust.
 
I don't have one either.
Though I use a 24-85 / 2.8-4.0 which is a mainstay for general usage. I like that it eliminates 3 primes ... 24mm, 50mm and 85mm for general usage. Though I still own 50 & 85 primes when I need the f/1.4
 
The internet is filled to the brim with experts.
 
I any of you decide you don't want your f2.8 24-70mm, you can just send it to me. I'm not proud! :biggrin-93:
 
who needs anything more than a 50mm?
 
who needs anything more than a 50mm?
I do. Birds won't let me get close enough for 50mm. Race cars running I don't WANT to get 50mm close to.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom