now is it just me or does all of this make no sense whatsoever??
It's not just you.

But for anyone else.
Hey folks, shoot what you want. Whatever pops your cork.
Film has some advantages in some situations. It costs more and if you are trying to sell photos, some places won't take film photos because of "grain". (which actually gives film some character) Film has better latitude. For time exposures and some other specialized uses, film beats digital.
However...
If you are shooting to sell, or want to be able to edit and print without a darkroom, and in the long run, digital costs less, digital is for you.
If you want versatility, speed, simplicity, and control in processing, on something as simple as your own computer. Easy storage and images that don't get dusty, scratched, discolored, water damaged, fungus or fade. Then you should move up to digital.
Arguing that film is better that digital is like arguing that your old rusty VW Bug is as good as a new Ferrari.
Want to own some really nice old cameras that take great pictures, at a bargain price, sure, go buy them, have some fun.
Why do you think film cameras are selling at ridiculous low prices. Now think about it. If film was so great, why are professionals dumping their top of the line medium format cameras and going to digital. Why do publications, for the most part, require digital images? Why does Kodak drop more types and sizes of film, each year.
I'd buy some more film cameras, if they came with a nice lens I could use on my digital cameras. I still shoot some of both, but I'm about 98% digital now.