Year End Bonus!!!

[jwbryson1]

Have you considered the Adorama Flashpoint 320M monolights??? Very low-cost for monolights that HAVE user-replaceable flashtubes and modeling lamps. I honestly believe that having modeling lamps helps beginners learn better, and faster, as well as to SHOOT better...they can literally "see" where the shadows fall on the face, lips, and neck areas...they can literally "see" the catchlights in the eyes, and know, before firing off a shot, if the main light is too high, or too far off to one side...

All this talk about Pocket Wizards...I spent 15+ years with nothing but optical slaves and a top-quality Paramount sync cord. When you have a modeling light in your main light, you can spin the fill light backwards, and then loosen the clamp on the main light and waggle it back and forth, and then up and down, and AIM it properly, getting a constant stream of real-time visual feedback as to what the light is doing...how centered in the beam is the subject? Is the light from the mainlight creating a shadow that drops down onto the upper lip? And so on and so on...

I honestly think you should consider a simple two-monolight, two umbrella or two-softbox setup from Adorama. Or Calumet's low-cost Genesis 200 kit. You do not need any transmitters or receivers: use the supplied PC connector cord, and put the second light on optical slave ON. Done! I've held this view for many years. The Strobist movement is a huge thing,and it has many defenders. Speedlights are quite capable. But if a guy wants to LEARN LIGHTING, it makes sense to use the tools that will allow him to actually SEE what he is doing as the lights are moved through their heights, and their arc, and their distances....that simply cannot be done with a speedlight.

Sending you PM.

 

[jwbryson1]

Have you considered the Adorama Flashpoint 320M monolights??? Very low-cost for monolights that HAVE user-replaceable flashtubes and modeling lamps. I honestly believe that having modeling lamps helps beginners learn better, and faster, as well as to SHOOT better...they can literally "see" where the shadows fall on the face, lips, and neck areas...they can literally "see" the catchlights in the eyes, and know, before firing off a shot, if the main light is too high, or too far off to one side...

All this talk about Pocket Wizards...I spent 15+ years with nothing but optical slaves and a top-quality Paramount sync cord. When you have a modeling light in your main light, you can spin the fill light backwards, and then loosen the clamp on the main light and waggle it back and forth, and then up and down, and AIM it properly, getting a constant stream of real-time visual feedback as to what the light is doing...how centered in the beam is the subject? Is the light from the mainlight creating a shadow that drops down onto the upper lip? And so on and so on...

I honestly think you should consider a simple two-monolight, two umbrella or two-softbox setup from Adorama. Or Calumet's low-cost Genesis 200 kit. You do not need any transmitters or receivers: use the supplied PC connector cord, and put the second light on optical slave ON. Done! I've held this view for many years. The Strobist movement is a huge thing,and it has many defenders. Speedlights are quite capable. But if a guy wants to LEARN LIGHTING, it makes sense to use the tools that will allow him to actually SEE what he is doing as the lights are moved through their heights, and their arc, and their distances....that simply cannot be done with a speedlight.

Big Mike suggested the Paul C. Buff transmitter/receivers as a cheaper alternative. I may try these out: Paul C. Buff - CyberSync™

 

[gsgary]

You can buy my speedotrons so I can buy the profotos gsgary speaks of

I only have Bowen