beagle100
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2015
- Messages
- 2,073
- Reaction score
- 546
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Perhaps I am showing my love of simple beauty of form rather than specifications, but looking at, holding and taking a few photos with the GFX and X1D side-by-side, they are so very different. The GFX if industrial, fat, and unwieldy-appearing (but not functioning, where it is superb) where the X1D is sleek, solid art-sculpture looking and feeling. The GFX had similar controls as the X Pro2, whereas the X1D had the apparent simplicity of the Leica Q. Different approach and feel of use. Obviously, I do not eschew the aesthetics and controls of the Fuji, as I appear to be about to buy the X Pro2, but have to make peace with it more than I would with others I have mentioned. Reliable and feature-packed Audi SUV vs. Porsche Cayenne in style. Honda vs Volvo.
I was never a fan of the usual Hasselblad lenses on the 500CM that I had for awhile, as they seemed too "clinical" to me. Yes, they produced precise, detailed images, but I really don't enjoy any of my desert photos taken with them like I do those from the Rollei or Leica.
Yes, I admit that I am drawn to artful rather than precise, and I guess that shows in my choices. All of which is to say that I loved the feel and form of the X1D, but would need to be convinced that the lenses had the character that I prefer. And none of that speaks in any way to the details of the technology and features of each camera, as I am not in the market for one.
The love of "simple beauty", more art than precise, sleek, reliable and feature packed
what about the lens, your budget and the pictures . does that matter anymore?
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless