ksmattfish
Now 100% DC - not as cool as I once was, but still
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2003
- Messages
- 7,019
- Reaction score
- 36
- Location
- Lawrence, KS
- Website
- www.henrypeach.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
terri said:...and not have to spend a ton of money.
I'd be hard pressed telling someone, especially a beginner on a budget, not to waste money on a format that's more affordable than ever, built like tanks, and still offers quality glass that will afford them years of casual shooting pleasure.
But I don't really think they are saving much money going with 645. The gear really isn't much cheaper. You get 6 more shots for your film cost + developing cost, but then again you will pay for 6 more prints per roll too. Unless they are shooting a dozen or more rolls a week I don't think they'll see much savings at all.
Almost all medium format film gear is more affordable than ever, and the size of the format has nothing to do with body or lens quality. On the other hand, a neg that's twice as big...well, everyone knows that bigger is better.
I'm just suggesting that a beginner investing in medium format really think about what they need/want, instead of assuming that the next size up from 35mm is the logical starting place. There are so many options with medium format cameras, especially compared to the homogenized world of 35mm SLRs.