My first wedding

[jakedoza]

so I shot my first wedding last month. The couple was very happy with the results as was I. It was very fun to shoot, and I cant wait for another wedding. I have so many ideas for my next shoot, but I wanted to share.

http://picasaweb.google.com/jamsessionphoto

 

[rubbertree]

IMO, the majority of them are underexposed. But I love the second picture, what a neat looking place.

 

[reg]

As long as they like them.

 

[MelodySoul]

I agree that some of the shots are underexposed and I'm not crazy about some of the PP, but you captured some beautiful moments. Great job for your first wedding!

 

[roadkill]

Nice job and congradulations. If anything I would err on the side of over exposure as you have a lot more room to work with RAW in pp. But good shots man.

 

[jakedoza]

I shot most of these in RAW but the lighting kinda was sucky being that the sun was setting and the trees made for blotchy lighting. Overall I think they turned out ok, but yes a lot of them were under exposed. Thanks for the replies!

 

[RyanLilly]

You can probably bump up the exposure on some of the shots, you can use a layer mask and concentrate on brightening the faces in a couple. You caught some very natural looking subjects, they look comfortable and not posed, should make fore some good memories.

 

[Early]

Except for the incandescent shots, I thought the high contrast in many of them didn't the bride justice.

 

[anubis404]

Some I didn't like, they seemed just like snapshots, but some of them were fantastic. Good job on your first wedding.

 

[ddm1975]

I agree that you didn't do bad for your first wedding! Some things mentioned can be fixed in pp especially if you shot RAW. Good luck with the next one!

 

[Craddie]

Some nice captures there - some great expressions, particularly those of the kids.

The PP treatment is quite inconsistent though -if you're not careful it could look like a collage of pictures from all of the guests' cameras.