TBAM
TPF Noob!
I really really like number 5.
However I unfortunately disagree with some of the posts here that your photos are great. I think that your subjects are the stars here.
Your photos resemble a lot of mine when I first started taking photos. You find interesting places, and take photos without thinking too much about composition or settings.
For example: Number 4 would have looked better with the ocean in focus and the shrubbery and fence out of focus. And possibly could have looked better as a portrait composition than a landscape. But that's just me.
Number 6 has way too much PP done on it, for my personal tastes.
Anyways, I don't mean to bag you out, or anything. But to me, the pictures are typical of someone new to photography with an SLR and a 2.8 lense. That you are essentially getting shots that you could get with a P&S except for the bit depth and depth of field created by the lens you are using.
I did the same thing.
What you'll realise the more you start to read and research is that many photographers who do it professionally, or exhibit their work would go to that same location and shoot a shot that would just blow your mind.
So, whilst they are good photos, I wouldn't rest on their laurels. I would go back to the places and try and get compositions that don't feel natural, and compositions that your mind doesn't automatically jump to.
Anyways, that's me being super critical. Welcome to the forums, and have fun!
However I unfortunately disagree with some of the posts here that your photos are great. I think that your subjects are the stars here.
Your photos resemble a lot of mine when I first started taking photos. You find interesting places, and take photos without thinking too much about composition or settings.
For example: Number 4 would have looked better with the ocean in focus and the shrubbery and fence out of focus. And possibly could have looked better as a portrait composition than a landscape. But that's just me.
Number 6 has way too much PP done on it, for my personal tastes.
Anyways, I don't mean to bag you out, or anything. But to me, the pictures are typical of someone new to photography with an SLR and a 2.8 lense. That you are essentially getting shots that you could get with a P&S except for the bit depth and depth of field created by the lens you are using.
I did the same thing.
What you'll realise the more you start to read and research is that many photographers who do it professionally, or exhibit their work would go to that same location and shoot a shot that would just blow your mind.
So, whilst they are good photos, I wouldn't rest on their laurels. I would go back to the places and try and get compositions that don't feel natural, and compositions that your mind doesn't automatically jump to.
Anyways, that's me being super critical. Welcome to the forums, and have fun!