Well, lying on the floor the photo would've been definitely different. Not sure if better or worse though, but I do know that the top of the trunk would've not been visible, and maybe the cabin would've disappeared partially or completely. The wide-angle lens might (or might not) have distorted the car too much.You sat to get this; but you should have been lying on the floor for a better effect; here your lens and face of car are parallel, which is less desirable....
There's only so much I can do about thatfurther the car does not look old enough which is the main limitation i found
That's exactly how we found them nothing moved, nothing added here.I also like the fact that both sun visors are down.
To be honest with you, I rarely ever process my images so they would look like a certain "period" photo would. I almosts always process my photos the same way (although there are exceptions of course).THe burn-in on the sky in the color image, and the B&W one, looks a bit too strong for this type of neo-realistic, decaying-landscape, documentary type feeling...it just draws a bit too much attention to the photographic "process" part of the photograph...it's just such an obvious vignette that it makes me more-cognizant of the fact that somebody (you, I hope!) decided, "Okay, I am going to burn those corners in pretty heavily."
The first time I read this part, I thought that you were nuts. The second time, however, I realized how good a point you made. Spot on, thanks for the feedback!In the upper, left hand side, I'd like to see that sidelighting on the tree in the background a bit brighter and more-crisp, so that would play a bit more with the cool shadowing of that weed clump that's growing out of the bumper...