What's new

2nd Wedding (pic heavy)

Holy crap, this is the first thread to re-rail itself in a while!! Awesome, I feel all warm and fuzzy...I just want to hug everyone.

:hug::
 
I guess my main Rant was against Schwettylens who claims to be a primary wedding photographer who thinks these results are perfectly normal. They aren't, and they shouldn't be...at least not professionally.

Dont lie. Your rant started ever since I started a fight with your friend bennilou. I made it no secret here that I am a newer photographer.
 
I guess my main Rant was against Schwettylens who claims to be a primary wedding photographer who thinks these results are perfectly normal. They aren't, and they shouldn't be...at least not professionally.

Dont lie. Your rant started ever since I started a fight with your friend bennilou. I made it no secret here that I am a newer photographer.
Bennielou is a friend of mine. As a matter of fact, she is one of my mentors. She has said some things online that I don't agree with, but I haven't read every one of her posts. I didn't know that, as you put it, "you started a fight with her". Obviously, I knew you were a newer photographer based on the quality of your advice, but I didn't know you had issues with one of my friends.

Honestly, what your your opinion is of another photog that I know and have seen their work would have never even registered. You're just an online guy with an opinion. There are tons of people out there like you. I've seen the prints and shot the weddings. What you think is the furthest thing from my mind. I assure you, my lack of respect for your opinion has soley to do with the quality of that opinion and nothing to do with any disagreements you have had with people I know.

You give yourself way too much credit to assume that I would remember you from some petty argument with a friend of mine that took place on an online forum probably before I ever joined.
 
Last edited:
I rather be new with mediocre photos than someone who claims have the experience and still produce mediocre photos.
 
I rather be new with mediocre photos than someone who claims have the experience and still produce mediocre photos.
Start a new thread. No reason to hijack the original posters thread any further. I would like to know what images I have posted that you think are 'mediocre'.

You seem to have an axe to grind because I am friends with a member you don't like. Get over it. Put up or shut up. Post a new thread and we will discuss it there.
 
lets see.. you have started TEN threads out of your 710 posts.

http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/search.php?searchid=373170
Your search doesn't work for me...again, start it in a new thread. You can also find posts at photocamel under the same username or at DPReview under the username whoisjohngalt. That should get you back to my photographic beginning and when I was searching for my first DSLR and was frustrated about the options.

Oh, for what it's worth, I have also recieved 135 likes out of that 710 posts...that's a ratio of 1:5.26. In case you were wondering, your ratio is about 1 in 22.
 
Last edited:
lets see.. you have started TEN threads out of your 710 posts.

http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/search.php?searchid=373170
Your search doesn't work for me...again, start it in a new thread. You can also find posts at photocamel under the same username or at DPReview under the username whoisjohngalt. That should get you back to my photographic beginning and when I was searching for my first DSLR and was frustrated about the options.

Oh, for what it's worth, I have also recieved 135 likes out of that 710 posts...that's a ratio of 1:5.26. In case you were wondering, your ratio is about 1 in 22.

CONGRATULATIONS.. I wish I can pat your back. If you are smart you should know the like system only started like a few months ago.
 
lets see.. you have started TEN threads out of your 710 posts.

http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/search.php?searchid=373170
Your search doesn't work for me...again, start it in a new thread. You can also find posts at photocamel under the same username or at DPReview under the username whoisjohngalt. That should get you back to my photographic beginning and when I was searching for my first DSLR and was frustrated about the options.

Oh, for what it's worth, I have also recieved 135 likes out of that 710 posts...that's a ratio of 1:5.26. In case you were wondering, your ratio is about 1 in 22.

CONGRATULATIONS.. I wish I can pat your back. If you are smart you should know the like system only started like a few months ago.
Haven't been posting here that long. If you were smart, you should know that any argument you had with Bennielou was probably before I started coming here, that you are attacking me without me knowing anything about what you are talking about and that your edits in this thread are still really bad, regardless of what history you have with somebody I happen to know.
 
Schwetty, you're fighting a losing battle. Your opponent has gone so far as to figure out, and report, "like" ratios as evidence of superiority, or something "like" that.
 
Bitter.. I wish I had your patience. You would have stopped long long ago. The thing I cant figure out is, he joined April 2010. Didnt post anything until April 2011 around the same time when I had a little argument with bennilou.... I guess my research is much worse than figuring out like ratio.

I STOP POSTING ON THIS THREAD. Thanks bitter!

Here is kerb's photos as requested.
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/4249357709/photos#page=1
 
Bitter.. I wish I had your patience. You would have stopped long long ago. The thing I cant figure out is, he joined April 2010. Didnt post anything until April 2011 around the same time when I had a little argument with bennilou.... I guess my research is much worse than figuring out like ratio.

I STOP POSTING ON THIS THREAD. Thanks bitter!

Here is kerb's photos as requested.
whoisjohngalt: Galleries: Digital Photography Review
Those are my photos. Again, start a new thread and if you feel the need, critique them and tell me why they are mediocre.

Heck, if those are the only ones you think are mediocre, I'll start the thread and let you have at it. Let me know if there are any other pics you want included.

There you go..
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/.../250790-medicocre-shots-comments-welcome.html

Let this thread alone.
 
Last edited:
About #6, the subject is too small for me. It would be better to zoom in little bit.
 
Well...... I'm back!

What did I miss?

[Reads thread].

Oh. Apparently nothing.

Same old ****, different day, eh?

To the op, keep on plugging away. If you can get past all the bitchslapping there is some good advice in this thread.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom