MichaelH
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2011
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- P-Town
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I think this has been said a billion times before but here goes..(Overread said it aswell) I seriously considered a D300S but I went with a D90 because it meant I could get more lenses. Now I have slowly built up my lens collection to the point where it is nearly complete apart from one lens.
Now when I next upgrade my camera body, I can invest in the body I really want as I know I don't need more lenses. As they say, glass is more important. The 60D will produce stunningly similar results to the 7D as its the same sensor, but as Penfolderoldo stated it depends whether you really need the extra Build quality and AF performance. I understand the 60D is not a flimsy piece of plastic like Canons rebel line, I understand it is a well built plastic camera. Tough Plastic as we know is alot tougher than we give it credit for.
Alright. I think I understand. You're saying that even though the 60d isn't completely up to build quality and AF performance of the 7d, it'll still be good enough for me.
Thank you everyone on your generous replies, as you probably get this question a lot.
One final question I have, this time regarding lenses. Is the Canon 28-135mm better than the 18-135?