KenC
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 5,699
- Reaction score
- 1,472
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
The first two are pretty good nature shots, although not as sharp as is usual in this area - I'm guessing no tripod and no IS, correct? Most of the serious nature photographers, even in camera clubs, shoot very sharp images, and usually images lacking in this area don't do well in competitions. I agree with Bus Rider about the crop for the first, and the second might benefit from a little cropping as well.
The distortion in the third isn't helpful to the image, imo. The rock is also a minor part of the image, which is mostly trees. Contrast this with #6, both in terms of depicting scale and the appearance of a rock face. #6 is by far the best of them.
The rake is OK, but I wish it was better separated from the background and the nearer part of it was more in focus.
The distortion in the third isn't helpful to the image, imo. The rock is also a minor part of the image, which is mostly trees. Contrast this with #6, both in terms of depicting scale and the appearance of a rock face. #6 is by far the best of them.
The rake is OK, but I wish it was better separated from the background and the nearer part of it was more in focus.