minicoop1985
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2013
- Messages
- 5,520
- Reaction score
- 1,866
- Location
- Appleton, WI
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Saw something online that inspired this. I literally rubber banded the 58mm f/1.4 Minolta Rokkor MC lens from my SRT-101 backwards onto my Olympus E-450 to see what on earth would happen-also had to use my 40-150 to get the other lens to stay put, then threw the combo on my tripod. Here's the results.

PB222313 by longm1985, on Flickr

PB222307 by longm1985, on Flickr

PB222306 by longm1985, on Flickr

PB222305 by longm1985, on Flickr
So here's what happened: Changing the focus on the Minolta lens made no discernible difference. Focus distance was about 2" in front of the lens-if that. INCREDIBLY thin DOF at times-note the anthers being in and out of focus. The Oly's autofocus seemed to function just as horribly as it usually does, but did actually work. Holy cow is this thing hard to get just still enough too-the SLIGHTEST motion and it's blurred beyond being useable. Glad to have a remote for that purpose. Does distort the edges and create a vignette. Definitely an interesting result, if you ask very biased me.

PB222313 by longm1985, on Flickr

PB222307 by longm1985, on Flickr

PB222306 by longm1985, on Flickr

PB222305 by longm1985, on Flickr
So here's what happened: Changing the focus on the Minolta lens made no discernible difference. Focus distance was about 2" in front of the lens-if that. INCREDIBLY thin DOF at times-note the anthers being in and out of focus. The Oly's autofocus seemed to function just as horribly as it usually does, but did actually work. Holy cow is this thing hard to get just still enough too-the SLIGHTEST motion and it's blurred beyond being useable. Glad to have a remote for that purpose. Does distort the edges and create a vignette. Definitely an interesting result, if you ask very biased me.