Rick58 said:
My wife and I are a blended family with 6 kids between us and 9 grand kids. We look at our grand kids and think they don't even know how to "play" like kids used to play. Some say it's the media, even going as far as using the 3 Stooges and the cartoon "roadrunner" as examples. I grew up with both of these "kids shows" but have never felt the need to hit someone on the head with a hammer.
But then I walked into my sons house and my 8 year old grand DAUGHTER was playing some western video game were she would walk up to cows and horses and shot them. The blood would fly, the animal was dead and she would laugh. THAT was scary. I could see where hours upon hours of this could desensitize a young mind. I think it different simply sitting back and watching compared to 'pulling the tigger" themselves. Like any "OLD man" my concerns were dismissed.
I've Grown up playing those types of games and watching the same cartoons and shows. I haven't committed mass murder nor will I. Runnah is right. It is education and the others are right that it is morality plays a big factor. Then again if something is chemically wrong in the brain education might not be able to overcome it.
Yeah. There is no ONE thing to blame for this kind of thing. It's a culmination of many ingredients.
As far as Ricks grand child not knowing how to play...and playing a violent video game. You can blame the parents. Don't blame it on the video game.
+1.
My undergraduate is in psychology and in several classes we spent a lot of time discussing this subject. My degree is certainly not a post-grad level, but what I have learned is that these games desensitize, they don't create.
It's very true, backed up by studies, and countless-ly tirelessly researched that violent media (video games, TV, you name it. Even news reports of crimes that don't actually show anything can have this same effect) can have a desensitization effect, it can make a person less likely to hesitate. It can take a person from holding a gun, to pulling the trigger.
In one such (very unethical) study from the 70's, two groups of children were researched for aggression and violent responses. One group was placed in a room, one at a time, and provoked and intimidated by a researcher. The other group was shown graphic footage from WWII and Viet Nam, footage of crimes, boxing matches, etc. In both groups, the ratio of children who reacted violently when provoked by the researcher was about the same. Some kids cried and cowered, others got angry and screamed or even hit the researchers. However, in the group that had witnessed the violent media, those who were agressive were much more agressive. They punched, kicked, bit, they became agressive quicker, and reacted more violently. They were also the only group to use weapons, chairs, books, clipboards, etc. Whatever they could find. Their violent outbursts, in addition to being more violent, also lasted longer.
So the point is, in this and similar studies, the violent media didn't really increase the number of individuals who reacted violently to stress, it did, however, increase HOW violent they were when stressed.
They do not, however, change anyone's personality. At least, studies haven't shown that. Millions of people absorb violent media and few of them end up harming someone. The scary part is, someone who is unwell, might be less likely to harm someone if not exposed to violent media, but in the end, we should treat the disease, not mask the symptoms.
People need to stop being so afraid of dealing with issues. Parents don't want to believe their kids are struggling with emotional or psychological issues, and people think counselling is only for almost-divorced couples and psychopaths. If we could show a little respect and love to our fellow man, and be there for people when they struggle instead of stigmatize them for having emotional or psychological issues, I really think we could make a difference. Again, treat the disease, not the symptom...