Personally, even as a new photographer, I feel skeptical about hiring a photographer who is "self-taught" because it could really mean anything (unless their work is exemplary) It shows a lot of dedication and perserverence to actually pursue a degree in your craft.
This is silly.
In like... 1 Million and one ways.
Is a formal education BAD? No.
Is it NECESSARY? Absolutely not.
I went to school for music recording technology (another art, is my point...) and I graduated and got my degree. Not only was I only a mediocre engineer, because I didn't spend as much time in the studio, practicing my craft, as I did hanging out at my friend's house and chillin' with my boyfriend when he was in town... I ended up deciding against doing anything with my degree.
Then there's our friend Kyle... who Keith has known since 6th grade.
That guy bought some cheap gear, and in middle school started to teach himself music recording. And then as he got older, he invested more and continued to learn.
He didn't go to college... as a matter of fact, he dropped out of high school.
He's working as a recording engineer.
I'm not.
I've never taken a formal photography course a day in my life. Do I still have improvements to make? Sure. I'll never feel like I don't, and I'll never stop learning, but I'm better than half the people I know that took *any* sort of class in photography and some that even have a degree.
My best friend here is an EXCELLENT photographer.
His degree is in Graphic Design. He's a self-taught photographer, with only one "photography 101" class that was required for his design degree under his belt.
90% of the photographers that I know that are great at what they do and working, are self-taught.
If am am not mistaken, one of the celebrity-status, big name, commercial photographers here in town does not have a photography degree.
Actually let me go check... ::goes to website::
FOUND IT! Here you go:
About | Jeremy Cowart
That little piece of paper means jack sh*t when it comes to the arts.
Can you do it, or can't you? That's all that matters.
You're still complaining [EDIT: Just saw when this was posted, so you're not "still" complaining, haha] about paying $400 for photos, but your problem isn't whether or not that woman had a degree.
We talked about it last night. I told you that the work she gave you was 100% reminiscent of the work on her site. Her site is poorly designed (I actually had to zoom out in my browser just to be able to see the full photos without heads cut off on her site), and it's evident that she gave her portfolio zero thought when putting it together.
You said she has a degree.
How did you feel about her work?
Not great, eh?
You shouldn't be scouring people's bios for evidence of a degree.
You should be scouring their portfolio for evidence of photographic capability.
That's what you're putting your money into... the result. Not the slice of dead tree they may or may not have their name inked onto.
