The difference between hair color of #1 & 2 versus #3 is pretty dramatic.
I'm not particularly fond of your cropping of the appendages. Each example shows an error of in-camera framing or post editing.
Thank you for your feedback kundalini. I appreciate your critique but I have to respectfully disagree though I'm obviously biased. You are 100% correct about the difference in hair color, but as I stated before that was intentional because of my color balance adjustments.
If you were to see each picture by itself, with no reference point of the subject or other pictures next to it, this argument would not be very valid. As for the cropping of appendages, that was also intentional because unless I am deliberately using negative space, I like to fill the frame to at least a reasonable extent. And having fingers and elbows etc. JUST in frame, at the edge of a frame is extremely aesthetically unattractive to me. Almost "cookie-cutter" if that makes sense. For example, if I extended the crop of her elbow in the first crop and stopped just past the tip of her elbow with some space in-between, it would look a little cheesy to me, and I would want to extend the crop even more past the elbow for more negative space provided the backdrop was either interesting enough or uniform enough (in this case I might find myself doing more work by cloning the bed to fill the rest of the frame).
But like I said, I am biased about this, being the one who took the shots, because the results reflect my own personal style. I suspect many will have different preferences about the color balance (I actually have about 5 different copies of each when it comes to white balance and color toning) but color differences aside, does anyone else find such a significant problem with the composition and cropping of the shots? I don't want to have tunnel vision and want to know if what I find aesthetically/artistically pleasing varies so much from what others find acceptable and effective.