To the uneducated few....
Everything is made in China, either directly or indirectly. I am sure if the lens/camera is not "made" in China the parts are and it is "assembled" elsewhere (e.g. Japan). If that is not the case, then the machine which makes the parts is probably made in China, if that is not the case then the machine that made the machine... you could go on forever. Welcome to a global economy, where people choose the cheapest because that is what capitalism is.
To the person who said that they would rather not give China their dollars, China is buying billions of dollars worth of government bonds, using money which it gets from trading with the world. Money goes both ways, there is not a big plug hole where it all disappears.
Whilst I am not saying that the conditions in the Chinese factories are good, they are much better than working in agriculture, people flock to the cities to get a job at the big companies like Foxconn and from what I have read recently the suicide rate is much lower at places like Foxconn. This does not stop the media from reporting about how western companies are causing the deaths, even though it is lower than the Chinese national average. If you studied history you would know how many people had similar conditions during the industrial revolution in the west, this is the same thing but happening later. Whilst it is not right it is pot calling kettle black, we cannot honestly say "you must follow our developed principles, rules, safety standards and copyrights etc., whilst having a much lower GDP than us", it just does not work because change is gradual.
I live in Hong Kong and even here I have seen some blatant rip-offs (e.g. JCB machinery which is identical to the real thing, minus the branding), it shows that the system is broken. Today I saw how Apple has secured a patent on a wedge shape for their iPad, since when should geometric shapes be up for patenting? (Source:
Apple's New MacBook Air Wedge Design Patent Could Destroy Ultrabooks. Sigh.) The sooner people share things for the common good the better, it would be in the consumers and public's interest for all patents regarding essential things to be cost shared between the major companies, this does not stop them innovating but the core of the product is cheaper and those savings are passed to us. If not, the length of a patent needs to be drastically reduced, so that the patent holder can make the profit for say 5 years and then it is shared on a cheap license to everyone else for a further 5 years before becoming free.