I don't think the pictures in the links looked like they were done professionally by a portrait photographer; the quality looked more like they were taken by just some person with a camera. They didn't look like the standard a portrait photographer would be able to do.
The quality on photo.net is inconsistent at best; some look pretty good and some aren't that well done. Portrait/professional photographers would probably not use that site as examples of good quality work.
Thought you were one of the crowd that said a professional photographer was a person who earned their living by taking photographs. And its ironic that when the point I made about PROFESSIONAL photographers using rumpled up sheets and blankets in photos,
and your like totally against that PERIOD..
that you decide that they are not professional because of the content they shoot, nor are they worth considering as actual professionals because they make money by taking pictures of naked people.
And ironically BOUDOIR is nothing but NAKED PEOPLE... gasp.... and PROFESSIONAL photographers take pictures of naked people..... We have that one guy on here who makes a living as a professional photographer. And most of his nude photo shoots are of naked dudes... so if you don't like pictures of naked dudes... then does that make HIM a NON PROFESSIONAL?