What's new

Buying lenses: New v. used

How much of your lens stable is new and how much is used?

  • All my lenses were purchased new.

    Votes: 13 26.0%
  • Most, but not all, are new.

    Votes: 11 22.0%
  • About 50-50.

    Votes: 7 14.0%
  • Most, but not all, were bought used.

    Votes: 13 26.0%
  • All of mine are used lenses.

    Votes: 5 10.0%
  • Where's the bacon?

    Votes: 1 2.0%

  • Total voters
    50

480sparky42 41

Chief Free Electron Relocator
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
25,393
Reaction score
9,148
Location
Iowa
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
What percentage of your lens line-up did you purchase as brank-spakin' new, and how much did you buy as used?
 
All of mine were bought as new. But I do only have two lenses, so...
 
And my next lens will probably be new....


Scott (never liked buying a problem) B
 
Only one was bought new, my Nikon 18-105 d7000 kit lens.
All other lenses were bought used but each came with 16oz of bacon.

You could say, I got a sizzling deal on each of them :mrgreen:

:biglaugh:
 
2 of my 3 lenses fit into a third category, factory refurbished. I don't know about any other brands, but a Nikon refurb might as well be new!
 
Entirely used. I would never buy lenses new - simply a cost issue. If it's something that doesn't deteriorate much over time, I'll buy used. Items like computers and bodies that go out of date every year - I buy new.

I have had some incredible deals on lenses just because they are cosmetically a bit battered. Just make sure you get the seller to get very clear pictures of the optics and make sure you trust them to take the lens back if it's not up to your standard.
 
All of mine are new, but lower end lenses since I can't afford top end lenses.

If I could look at a lens in person to see how it is, then yea, I would buy used.
Otherwise, if online, you don't know how legitimate the claims or even the pictures are.
 
Maybe my vote is skewed a bit, because my camera body came with 2 kit lenses....out of my 4. I bought the 35mm 1.8 new, because it's just $200. But I got the 10-24mm used for several hundred cheaper than new. I don't think I'll buy a brand new lens again. It's like buying a brand new car versus one right off lease.
 
Almost if not everything I use is new for my Canon setup - but I've got a fair few second hand items and lenses around for some older gear so mostly new. Given the choice I try to go for new where I can.
 
Only lens I bought new was the 18-55mm kit lens that came with my D5100. Everything else I've bought used (or refurb). That's nine lenses bought used so far (though I don't still have all of them) and out of the nine, only one did NOT perform at the level I'd expected from that lens, but then that lens had cost me about $40, so I probably shouldn't have expected as much from it as I did. That was also one of the first extra lenses I bought, and the $40 was well worth the lesson to buy quality and do your research on a lens before you buy.
 
71% Used. Two new: AF 24/2.8, AF 50/1.8 Nikkors; five used: AI-S 105/4 micro Nikkor, AF-S 55-200 kit, and the three that came with the FT3 - Vivitar 28/2.5, Nikkor-S Auto 50/1.4 & Vivitar 75-205/3.8 Close Focus. The 155-200 replaced my 18-135 kit lens which I gave to son #2 when his 18-55 broke.

I'm at 50% for working bodies: the N90S and the Nikkormat were used, while the D40 and Minolta rangefinder were new.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom