Nikon_Josh
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 936
- Reaction score
- 95
- Location
- Surrey, UK
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Is there a payed Canon shill on this forum??? Sure seems like it...Never heard of a Canon shill? You know, one of those people who gets payed under the table to go around and pretend to be a regular guy, but who really is one of many satellite employees of Canon's marketing department....you know, part of their big guerilla astroturf marketing force...
Remember--I am the guy who spent around $10,000 of his OWN, CASH MONEY on Canon equipment, to go along with my 30+ years' worth of Nikon gear...I'm the guy who shoots BOTH Canon, AND Nikon gear...I am the guy whose avatar picture is me, holding my 5D + grip and normal lens...I'm the guy who can tell you the differences between Canon gear and Nikon gear from my own, personal, experience with BOTH brands....not some pro-Canon fanboy who has a hard-on for anybody who shoots something else...
Canon's marketing department will stop at almost NOTHING...
http://blog.kareldonk.com/the-digital-picturecom-deletes-anti-canon-post-about-the-eos-5d-mark-ii/
My favorite though, might be the fact that the blog Canon Filmmakers.com was forced to cease and desist this immediately past June!!! A web blog dedicated to making films with Canon d-slr's was...forced to shut down...by Canon!!!!
CanonFilmmakers.com Forced to Close by... Canon! -- photographyvoice.com
Here's the problem Derrel. No matter how much money you've spent on what doesn't change the fact that Canon's video options are better than Nikons. I don't care if you shoot Pentax, Sony Olympus, or whatever. Show my why a director would pick a Nikon DSLR over a Canon DSLR for video? Especially professional video?
Please do that so you can justify that you know more than everyone else and that it's OK for you to insult forum members whenever you feel like it.
I have noticed he has somehow managed to ignore the comments about the 5D being used by directors being a Canon Marketing ploy, we can't know for sure that it is. But it certainly seems rather strange to me that Canon are getting so much marketing blurb off the back of these ventures, it seems it's got to the point that because directors use Canon, all the other manufacturers produce RUBBISH video because directors are only using Canon! Very clever on Canons part!
Instead of actually engaging me in discussion, he has personally accused me of being a jealous little kid because Nikon are not as good in his eyes!
I have just noticed something rather interesting though, Village idiot owns a Canon 5d Mark II! Soooo now we know who filmed the episode of House! It was Village Idiot, how do you find time out from filiming 'House' to comment on these forums?? haha.
Reading. FTW
You'll also see that after that, I was mentioning about the formats that Canon shoots in compared to Nikon. Do you really want me to go and retype all the formats available with Canon cameras, not to mention brining up the Magic Lantern firmware that makes Canon camera superior to Nikon for video work? Up until the D7000 and the D5100 Nikon couldn't even do 1080p, the best they could record at was 24fps @ 720p, which I already mentioned in this thread.OH WOW I'm so impressed! Canon have paid for them to use the 5D MARK II, now all Canon users will have to go round telling everyone the 5D was used for video in Captain Murica and it was also used to film 'House'?? God If I have another Canon user telling me 'Did you know the 5D mark II was used to film House??' I will reach for a gun!
This isn't sarcastic honest!! Did you know they used the 5D Mark II to film 'House'???? I hope you did know that!!
Canon didn't have to pay them anything. Nikon is just catching up in the HDSLR market and until the D7000(iir, may have been the lower end model before that) didn't have a camera that would even do 1080p. They're also limited in the filming formats. Canon has been ontop of the HDSLR game since the release of their first camera with video, the 5D MKII.
Now, do me a favor and let's have this experiment that will prove two things, why directors would use Canon of Nikon and whether or not you're an idiot. If you were going to make or build anything and you had the option of using two tools, would you use the one that allowed you to finish the project (sandwich, car, skyscaper, cake, etc...) with a higher quality and the correct format or would you use the one that gave the finished project a lower quality and only allowed one format?
Canon cameras can shoot at 24fps, 25 fps, and 30fps @ 1080p and some can shoot at 60fps at 720p. Go research Nikon DSLRs and tell me how they're better for recording professional video.
And if you remember (if you even read), I posted about other uses for the 5D MKII than House (which is more than one episode). I think I even posted a the name of the site 5dcinema.com, which if you check out you'll see the music videos, ad work, and indie productions that I mentioned people were using the 5D MKII.
I'm sorry that you two feel like I'm a "shill" for posting up an article that mentioned the 5D MKII being used in a block buster, but if Nikon could do video as well or better than Canon, then maybe you'd see more headlines about Nikon being used be professionals in big name production. Oh wait, has Nikon ever been used to film anything other than soccer games and home movies?
You miss the point again, my point was not about Nikon being better than Canon or Canon being better than Nikon. You turned it into that discussion, that was the only point I was making.
I accept that Canon are better than Nikon at video, I was slightly frustrated at Nikon myself for not catching up quicker. But it got turned into you saying Canon are better than Nikon and I'm jealous.
I accept that the 5D MK2 is great for use as a video camera, but again you seem to be point scoring about why Canon are better than Nikon.
And oh yeah, I say it again and I said it before! The Panasonic GH2 is BETTER at video than the 5D Mk2, but it can't be as good because directors haven't said anything about them.
It would appear to be raining outside, but it can't be because Village idiot and film directors say it isn't!